Hi Andre,
On 1/7/20 1:19 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:47:52 +0100
> Eric Auger wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> thanks a lot for your work on these elaborate tests! I have some PMU test
> extensions as well, but they are nowhere as sophisticated as yours!
>
> Just ran this on my
Sean Christopherson writes:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> index b5e49e6bac63..400ac8da75e8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> @@ -561,6 +561,10 @@ static inline void u
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:42:51PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:25:12PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:10:42PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:05:12PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > On 2019-12-23
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:25:12PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:10:42PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:05:12PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On 2019-12-23 11:56, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > > > My original concern in the cover lett
Hi Andre,
On 1/9/20 6:30 PM, André Przywara wrote:
> On 09/01/2020 16:54, Auger Eric wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
>> On 1/3/20 7:12 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:47:51 +0100
>>> Eric Auger wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
If event counters are implemented check the common events
On 09/01/2020 16:54, Auger Eric wrote:
Hi Eric,
> On 1/3/20 7:12 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:47:51 +0100
>> Eric Auger wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>>> If event counters are implemented check the common events
>>> required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
>>>
>>> Some are uncond
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:10:42PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:05:12PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 2019-12-23 11:56, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 10:42:05AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:30:18 +,
> > > > Andrew
Hi Andre,
On 1/3/20 7:12 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:47:51 +0100
> Eric Auger wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
>> If event counters are implemented check the common events
>> required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
>>
>> Some are unconditionally required (SW_INCR, CPU_CYCLES,
>> eith
From: Raphael Gault
Both __guest_entry and __guest_exit functions do not setup
a correct stack frame. Because they can be considered as callable
functions, even if they are particular cases, we chose to silence
the warnings given by objtool by annotating them as non-standard.
Signed-off-by: Raph
From: Raphael Gault
Annotate assembler functions which are callable but do not
setup a correct stack frame.
Signed-off-by: Raphael Gault
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry
Cc: Marc Zyngier
Cc: James Morse
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
---
arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S | 3
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 08:38:54AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 12/30/2019 01:57 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport
> >
> > Hi,
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> >
> > This is a part of clean up of the page table manipulation code that aims to
> > remove asm-generic/5level-fixup.
On 26/12/2019 13:58, Zengruan Ye wrote:
Support the vcpu_is_preempted() functionality under KVM/arm64. This will
enhance lock performance on overcommitted hosts (more runnable VCPUs
than physical CPUs in the system) as doing busy waits for preempted
VCPUs will hurt system performance far worse th
On 26/12/2019 13:58, Zengruan Ye wrote:
Implement the service call for configuring a shared structure between a
VCPU and the hypervisor in which the hypervisor can tell the VCPU is
running or not.
The preempted field is zero if 1) some old KVM deos not support this filed.
NIT: s/deos/does/
Ho
On 26/12/2019 13:58, Zengruan Ye wrote:
Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 to obtain the VCPU
is currently running or not.
The PV lock structure of the guest is allocated by user space.
A hypercall interface is provided for the guest to interrogate the
hypervisor's support f
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:25:04AM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:23:37AM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:10:21PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 12:36:11PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > On 2020-01-08 11:58, Will Deac
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:23:37AM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:10:21PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 12:36:11PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On 2020-01-08 11:58, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 11:17:16AM +, Marc Zyngie
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:10:21PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 12:36:11PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 2020-01-08 11:58, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 11:17:16AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > On 2020-01-07 15:13, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > > > > Lo
On 2020-01-09 09:24, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-01-09 05:59, Jianyong Wu wrote:
[...]
So we focus it on arm64. Also I have never tested it on arm32 machine
( we lack of arm32 machine)
I'm sure your employer can provide you with such a box. I can probably
even tell you which cupboard they a
On 2020-01-09 05:59, Jianyong Wu wrote:
Hi Marc,
-Original Message-
From: Marc Zyngier
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 5:29 PM
To: Jianyong Wu
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; yangbo...@nxp.com; john.stu...@linaro.org;
t...@linutronix.de; pbonz...@redhat.com;
sean.j.christopher...@intel.co
On 2020-01-09 05:45, Jianyong Wu wrote:
Hi Marc,
-Original Message-
From: Marc Zyngier
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 5:16 PM
To: Jianyong Wu
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; yangbo...@nxp.com; john.stu...@linaro.org;
t...@linutronix.de; pbonz...@redhat.com;
sean.j.christopher...@intel.co
20 matches
Mail list logo
