On 04/04/20 16:36, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> This pull request is a repost of an older request, plus it
> contains Eric's new PMU and ITS tests.
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
>
> The following changes since commit ce27fa2c7cd4d07859a9a2e81c7ff641897818d1:
>
> x86: vmx: skip atomic_switch_ov
Hi,
I've tested this patch by running badblocks and fio on a flash device inside a
guest, everything worked as expected.
I've also looked at the flowcharts for device operation from Intel Application
Note 646, pages 12-21, and they seem implemented correctly.
A few minor issues below.
On 2/21/2
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 12:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 09:44, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:32:27AM +, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > > Injecting external data abort through KVM might trigger
> > > an issue on kernels that do not get updated to includ
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 09:44, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:32:27AM +, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > Injecting external data abort through KVM might trigger
> > an issue on kernels that do not get updated to include the KVM fix.
> > For those and aarch32 guests, the injected a
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 09:44, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:32:27AM +, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > Injecting external data abort through KVM might trigger
> > an issue on kernels that do not get updated to include the KVM fix.
> > For those and aarch32 guests, the injected a
On 04/06/2020 10:39 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:03PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
>> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
>> which does macro replacement for
