Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.0-rc1

2022-08-15 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in v6.0-rc1[1] compared to v5.19[2]. Summarized: - build errors: +26/-15 + /kisskb/src/arch/parisc/kernel/vdso32/restart_syscall.S: Error: .cfi_endproc without corresponding

Re: [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64

2021-05-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Marc, On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:32 AM Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2021 09:18:27 +0100, > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:01 AM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 May 2021 08:52:42 +0100, > > > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64

2021-05-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Marc, On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:01 AM Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2021 08:52:42 +0100, > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:13 AM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On 2021-05-11 10:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar

Re: [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64

2021-05-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Marc, On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:13 AM Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2021-05-11 10:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> From: Jianyong Wu > >> > >> Currently, there is no mechanism to keep time sync bet

Re: [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64

2021-05-11 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
) || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && > ARM_ARCH_TIMER) Why does this not depend on KVM_GUEST on ARM? I.e. shouldn't the dependency be: KVM_GUEST && (X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER)) ? > default y > help >

Re: [PATCH 4/5] sh: Get rid of oprofile leftovers

2021-04-14 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 3:53 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > perf_pmu_name() and perf_num_counters() are unused. Drop them. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Lin

Re: [PATCH 07/14] ARM: spectre-v2: add Cortex A8 and A15 validation of the IBE bit

2018-05-22 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
r_err("CPU%u: %s", smp_processor_id(), msg); pr_alert(), to match the patch description. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

2017-04-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
tion for >> gcc earlier than 4.3. > > This sounds good to me! +1 Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

2017-04-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
oesn't have this particular bug, or it was a regression between > gcc-4.1.2 and 4.1.3. Mine is also some patched version of 4.1.1, built from Ubuntu sources: gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-21) These sources probably even contained the fixes to make gcc-4.1.1 usable

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

2017-04-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Arnd, On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> Based on what I found so far, gcc-4 can be pretty much ruled out from >>> b

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

2017-04-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
rgd, .bii = 0, .offset = 0 }; + struct gfs2_rbm rbm = { .bii = 0, .offset = 0 }; + rbm.rgd = rgd; + while (1) { down_write(&sdp->sd_log_flush_lock); Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux b

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

2016-12-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Arnd, On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, December 16, 2016 4:54:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > Specifically on ARM, going further makes things rather useless especially >

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

2016-12-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
-gcc-4.1.2 and looking at the compiler warnings for years, so I only have to look at new warnings. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call