Hi Florian and Linus Walleij!
Thanks Florian for picking these patches up.
Thanks Linus Walleij for review these patches.
Yes, This patch is refactoring patch. But we need use set_ttbr0/get_ttbr0
(in 0005-Initialize-the-mapping-of-KASan-shadow-memory.patch) which is define
in
This patch. So if
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 19:39, Russell King - ARM Linux:
>On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:30:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 02/04/18 13:04, Abbott Liu wrote:
>> > From: Andrey Ryabinin
>> >
>> > Disable instrumentation for arch/arm/boot/compressed/*
>> > ,arch/arm/kvm/hyp/* and arch/arm/vdso/*
On 26 March 2018 at 7:59, Joel Stanley wrote:
>On 18 March 2018 at 23:23, Abbott Liu wrote:
>
>>These patches add arch specific code for kernel address sanitizer
>> (see Documentation/kasan.txt).
>
>Thanks for implementing this. I gave the series a spin on an ASPEED
>ast2500 (ARMv5) system
On 03/20/2018 2:30 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S: Assembler messages:
>>> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:85: Error: invalid constant
>>> (b6e0) after fixup
I'm sorry!
We need to add the fellowing code to solve
On 03/20/2018 2:30 AM, Abbott Liu wrote:
>BTW, it looks like you have some section mismatches:
>
>WARNING: vmlinux.o(.meminit.text+0x40): Section mismatch in reference
>from the function kasan_pte_populate() to the function
>.init.text:kasan_alloc_block.constprop.5()
>The function __meminit kasan_p
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 16:44 , Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>Hi Abbott,
>
>I've skimmed through the changes and they generally look good to me. I
>am not an expect in arm, so I did not look too closely on these parts
>(which is actually most of the changes).
>
>FWIW
>Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov
>
>Please als
On 19/03/2018 16:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>You need to extend this at least to arch/arm/kvm/hyp/Makefile, as the
>KASAN shadow region won't be mapped in HYP. See commit a6cdf1c08cbfe for
>more details (all the arm64 comments in this patch apply to 32bit as well).
Thanks for your review.
I will disab
On 03/19/2018 09:23 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>On 03/18/2018 06:20 PM, Liuwenliang (Abbott Liu) wrote:
>> On 03/19/2018 03:14 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Thanks for posting these patches! Just FWIW, you cannot quite add
>>> someone's Tested-by for a patch
On 03/19/2018 03:14 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>Thanks for posting these patches! Just FWIW, you cannot quite add
>someone's Tested-by for a patch series that was just resubmitted given
>the differences with v1. I just gave it a spin on a Cortex-A5 (no LPAE)
>and it looks like test_kasan.ko is pas
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 21:21:20PM +0800, Russell King wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:53:36PM +0800, Abbott Liu wrote:
>> Because in some architecture(eg. arm) instruction set, non-aligned
>> access support is not very well, so 2 1-byte checks is more
>> safer than 1 2-byte check. The impact on
10 matches
Mail list logo