On 18/09/20 19:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Here's the latest set of fixes for 5.9. The first patch is pretty
> nasty, as a guest hitting this bug will have its vcpu stuck on a
> fault, without any hope of it being resolved. Embarrassing, and
> definitely a stable candidate. The second
Hi Paolo,
Here's the latest set of fixes for 5.9. The first patch is pretty
nasty, as a guest hitting this bug will have its vcpu stuck on a
fault, without any hope of it being resolved. Embarrassing, and
definitely a stable candidate. The second patch is only a cleanup
after the first one.
On 09/09/20 19:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-09-09 16:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 04/09/20 12:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Hi Paolo,
>>>
>>> Here's a bunch of fixes for 5.9. The gist of it is the stolen time
>>> rework from Andrew, but we also have a couple of MM fixes that have
>>> surfaced
On 2020-09-09 16:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/09/20 12:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Here's a bunch of fixes for 5.9. The gist of it is the stolen time
rework from Andrew, but we also have a couple of MM fixes that have
surfaced as people have started to use hugetlbfs in anger.
Hi
On 04/09/20 12:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Here's a bunch of fixes for 5.9. The gist of it is the stolen time
> rework from Andrew, but we also have a couple of MM fixes that have
> surfaced as people have started to use hugetlbfs in anger.
Hi Marc,
I'll get to this next Friday.
Hi Paolo,
Here's a bunch of fixes for 5.9. The gist of it is the stolen time
rework from Andrew, but we also have a couple of MM fixes that have
surfaced as people have started to use hugetlbfs in anger.
Please pull,
M.
The following changes since commit
