On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/19 10:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > +KVM, Paolo and Radim,
> >
> > Guys, do you mind picking this single patch and sending it to Linus?
> > That's the only fix left for 5.2. Alternatively, I can send you a pull
> > request,
On 04/07/19 10:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +KVM, Paolo and Radim,
>
> Guys, do you mind picking this single patch and sending it to Linus?
> That's the only fix left for 5.2. Alternatively, I can send you a pull
> request, but it feels overkill.
Sure, will do.
Paolo
> Either way, please let me
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:04:08AM +, Zhang, Lei wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have started up KVM guest os successfully with SVE feature with Dave' patch.
>
> Tested-by: Zhang Lei
Thanks for verifying.
It's really your fix, I only wrote a commit message for it :)
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
Biesheuvel ; Marc
> Zyngier ; Catalin Marinas
> ; Will Deacon ; Zhang,
> Lei/張 雷 ; Julien Grall ;
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64/sve: Fix vq_present() macro to yield a bool
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 08:32:52AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 03-07-19, 18:42, Dave Martin wrote:
> > From: Zhang Lei
> >
> > The original implementation of vq_present() relied on aggressive
> > inlining in order for the compiler to know that the code is
> > correct, due to some
+KVM, Paolo and Radim,
Guys, do you mind picking this single patch and sending it to Linus?
That's the only fix left for 5.2. Alternatively, I can send you a pull
request, but it feels overkill.
Either way, please let me know.
Thanks,
M.
On Wed, 03 Jul 2019 18:42:50 +0100,
Dave Martin
On 03-07-19, 18:42, Dave Martin wrote:
> From: Zhang Lei
>
> The original implementation of vq_present() relied on aggressive
> inlining in order for the compiler to know that the code is
> correct, due to some const-casting issues. This was causing sparse
> and clang to complain, while GCC
From: Zhang Lei
The original implementation of vq_present() relied on aggressive
inlining in order for the compiler to know that the code is
correct, due to some const-casting issues. This was causing sparse
and clang to complain, while GCC compiled cleanly.
Commit 0c529ff789bc addressed this
