On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:42:25 +0800, Jia He wrote:
> If the start addr is not aligned with the granule size of that level.
> loop step size should be adjusted to boundary instead of simple
> kvm_granual_size(level) increment. Otherwise, some mmu entries might miss
> the chance to be walked through.
>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:16:25AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2021-03-04 00:46, Justin He wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 07:07:37PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > From e0524b41a71e0f17d6dc8f197e421e677d584e72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Jia He
> > > > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 202
; Quentin Perret ;
linux-arm-
ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix unaligned addr case in mmu
walking
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 07:07:37PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From e0524b41a71e0f17d6dc8f197e421e677d584e72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
Quentin Perret ; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix unaligned addr case in mmu walking
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 07:07:37PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > From e0524b41a71e0f17d6dc8f197e421e677d584e72 Mon Se
9 PM
> To: Marc Zyngier
> Cc: Justin He ; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; James
> Morse ; Julien Thierry ;
> Suzuki Poulose ; Catalin Marinas
> ; Will Deacon ; Gavin Shan
> ; Yanan Wang ; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATC
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 07:07:37PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From e0524b41a71e0f17d6dc8f197e421e677d584e72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jia He
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:42:25 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix range alignment when walking page tables
>
> When walking the page tables
On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:29:34 +,
Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:42:25AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > If the start addr is not aligned with the granule size of that level.
> > loop step size should be adjusted to boundary instead of simple
> > kvm_granual_size(level) increment. O
On Wednesday 03 Mar 2021 at 09:54:25 (+), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Jia,
>
> On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:42:25 +,
> Jia He wrote:
> >
> > If the start addr is not aligned with the granule size of that level.
> > loop step size should be adjusted to boundary instead of simple
> > kvm_granual_si
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:54:25AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Jia,
>
> On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:42:25 +,
> Jia He wrote:
> >
> > If the start addr is not aligned with the granule size of that level.
> > loop step size should be adjusted to boundary instead of simple
> > kvm_granual_size(l
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:42:25AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> If the start addr is not aligned with the granule size of that level.
> loop step size should be adjusted to boundary instead of simple
> kvm_granual_size(level) increment. Otherwise, some mmu entries might miss
> the chance to be walked thr
Hi Jia,
On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:42:25 +,
Jia He wrote:
>
> If the start addr is not aligned with the granule size of that level.
> loop step size should be adjusted to boundary instead of simple
> kvm_granual_size(level) increment. Otherwise, some mmu entries might miss
> the chance to be wal
If the start addr is not aligned with the granule size of that level.
loop step size should be adjusted to boundary instead of simple
kvm_granual_size(level) increment. Otherwise, some mmu entries might miss
the chance to be walked through.
E.g. Assume the unmap range [data->addr, data->end] is
[0x
12 matches
Mail list logo