On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:56:29PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Hi Drew,
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > Since commit 93390c0a1b20 ("arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU
> > > feat
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Since commit 93390c0a1b20 ("arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU
> > features from guests") we can hide cpu features from guests. Apply
> > this to
Hi Drew,
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Since commit 93390c0a1b20 ("arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU
> features from guests") we can hide cpu features from guests. Apply
> this to a long standing issue where guests see a PMU available, but
> it's not, becau
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Since commit 93390c0a1b20 ("arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU
> features from guests") we can hide cpu features from guests. Apply
> this to a long standing issue where guests see a PMU available, but
> it's not, because it was
Since commit 93390c0a1b20 ("arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU
features from guests") we can hide cpu features from guests. Apply
this to a long standing issue where guests see a PMU available, but
it's not, because it was not enabled by KVM's userspace.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
---
arc