On 11/22/19 2:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> RTH: vaguely wondering if this might be related to the
> bug you ran into trying to test your VHE emulation
> patchset...
Thanks for the thought. It might be related, but it isn't the final cause:
the inner guest does not yet succeed including this
On Friday 22 Nov 2019 at 13:58:33 (+), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The ARMv8 ARM states when executing at EL2, EL3 or Secure EL1,
> ISR_EL1 shows the pending status of the physical IRQ, FIQ, or
> SError interrupts.
>
> Unfortunately, QEMU's implementation only considers the HCR_EL2
> bits, and
On 11/22/19 3:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 13:59, Marc Zyngier wrote:
The ARMv8 ARM states when executing at EL2, EL3 or Secure EL1,
ISR_EL1 shows the pending status of the physical IRQ, FIQ, or
SError interrupts.
Unfortunately, QEMU's implementation only considers the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 01:58:33PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The ARMv8 ARM states when executing at EL2, EL3 or Secure EL1,
> ISR_EL1 shows the pending status of the physical IRQ, FIQ, or
> SError interrupts.
>
> Unfortunately, QEMU's implementation only considers the HCR_EL2
> bits, and
The ARMv8 ARM states when executing at EL2, EL3 or Secure EL1,
ISR_EL1 shows the pending status of the physical IRQ, FIQ, or
SError interrupts.
Unfortunately, QEMU's implementation only considers the HCR_EL2
bits, and ignores the current exception level. This means a hypervisor
trying to look at
