When I implemented the parallel faults series I was mostly focused on
improving the performance of 8.1+ implementations which bring us
FEAT_HAFDBS. In so doing, I failed to put access faults on the read side
of the MMU lock.
Anyhow, this small series adds support for handling access faults in
para
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:19:42 +,
Oliver Upton wrote:
>
> When I implemented the parallel faults series I was mostly focused on
> improving the performance of 8.1+ implementations which bring us
> FEAT_HAFDBS. In so doing, I failed to put access faults on the read side
> of the MMU lock.
>
> A
