Hi David,
On Thu, 07 May 2020 15:36:17 +0100,
David Brazdil wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> >
> > What breaks without this constraint? Is it a fix that should go in
> > early? Otherwise looks good.
>
> This only becomes an issue when __hyp_call_panic_nvhe() and
> __hyp_call_panic_vhe() are moved to s
Hi Marc,
>
> What breaks without this constraint? Is it a fix that should go in
> early? Otherwise looks good.
This only becomes an issue when __hyp_call_panic_nvhe() and
__hyp_call_panic_vhe() are moved to separate files, so I don't think it's
necessary to go in early.
Currently the string var
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:48:19 +0100,
David Brazdil wrote:
>
> __hyp_call_panic_nvhe contains inline assembly which did not declare
> its dependency on the __hyp_panic_string symbol.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
__hyp_call_panic_nvhe contains inline assembly which did not declare
its dependency on the __hyp_panic_string symbol.
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/
