On 17/10/17 15:36, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:34:15AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 16/10/17 21:08, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
The only case where we actually need to perform a dache maintenance
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:34:15AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 16/10/17 21:08, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> The only case where we actually need to perform a dache maintenance
> >> is when we map the page for the first time, and
On 16/10/17 21:08, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> The only case where we actually need to perform a dache maintenance
>> is when we map the page for the first time, and subsequent permission
>> faults do not require cache maintenance.
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The only case where we actually need to perform a dache maintenance
> is when we map the page for the first time, and subsequent permission
> faults do not require cache maintenance. Let's make it conditional
> on not being a
The only case where we actually need to perform a dache maintenance
is when we map the page for the first time, and subsequent permission
faults do not require cache maintenance. Let's make it conditional
on not being a permission fault (and thus a translation fault).
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
