On 25/01/2019 12:33, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering, could this patch be split in two? One for the
> introduction of kvm_arm_timer_read_sysreg() +
> kvm_arm_timer_write_sysreg() and the other for merging the handlers into
> a single function?
Maybe. I'm not sure it brings us much t
Hi,
I'm wondering, could this patch be split in two? One for the
introduction of kvm_arm_timer_read_sysreg() +
kvm_arm_timer_write_sysreg() and the other for merging the handlers into
a single function?
On 24/01/2019 14:00, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> From: Andre Przywara
>
> At the moment we h
From: Andre Przywara
At the moment we have separate system register emulation handlers for
each timer register. Actually they are quite similar, and we rely on
kvm_arm_timer_[gs]et_reg() for the actual emulation anyways, so let's
just merge all of those handlers into one function, which just mars
