On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:52:03PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I queued this series for 5.7, apart from patch 12. I'll try to fix any
> conflicts with whatever patches I'm adding but may drop some of them if
> they conflict badly with code in -next (not likely). We'll revisit at
> -rc1 to see
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:22:19PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:37:18PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > I wonder whether it would be easier to merge all these patches at
> > 5.7-rc1, once most of the major changes went in.
>
> Only thing I can think that doing that
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:37:18PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:41:21PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > This hunk is going to conflict badly with the EFI tree. I will
> > incorporate this change for v5.7, so could you please just drop it
> > from this patch?
Will
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:41:21PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 21:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> > In an effort to clarify and simplify the annotation of assembly functions
> > in the kernel new macros have been introduced. These replace ENTRY and
> > ENDPROC and also add a new
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 21:02, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> In an effort to clarify and simplify the annotation of assembly functions
> in the kernel new macros have been introduced. These replace ENTRY and
> ENDPROC and also add a new annotation for static functions which previously
> had no
In an effort to clarify and simplify the annotation of assembly functions
in the kernel new macros have been introduced. These replace ENTRY and
ENDPROC and also add a new annotation for static functions which previously
had no ENTRY equivalent. Update the annotations in the core kernel code to
