From: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> Ensure we're actually accounting run_delay before we claim that we'll expose it to the guest. If we're not, then we just pretend like steal time isn't supported in order to avoid any confusion.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200622142710.18677-1-drjo...@redhat.com --- arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c index 1e0f4c284888..f7b52ce1557e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #include <linux/arm-smccc.h> #include <linux/kvm_host.h> +#include <linux/sched/stat.h> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> #include <asm/pvclock-abi.h> @@ -73,6 +74,11 @@ gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return base; } +static bool kvm_arm_pvtime_supported(void) +{ + return !!sched_info_on(); +} + int kvm_arm_pvtime_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { @@ -82,7 +88,8 @@ int kvm_arm_pvtime_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ret = 0; int idx; - if (attr->attr != KVM_ARM_VCPU_PVTIME_IPA) + if (!kvm_arm_pvtime_supported() || + attr->attr != KVM_ARM_VCPU_PVTIME_IPA) return -ENXIO; if (get_user(ipa, user)) @@ -110,7 +117,8 @@ int kvm_arm_pvtime_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *user = (u64 __user *)attr->addr; u64 ipa; - if (attr->attr != KVM_ARM_VCPU_PVTIME_IPA) + if (!kvm_arm_pvtime_supported() || + attr->attr != KVM_ARM_VCPU_PVTIME_IPA) return -ENXIO; ipa = vcpu->arch.steal.base; @@ -125,7 +133,8 @@ int kvm_arm_pvtime_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, { switch (attr->attr) { case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PVTIME_IPA: - return 0; + if (kvm_arm_pvtime_supported()) + return 0; } return -ENXIO; } -- 2.27.0 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
