On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 23:02 +, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > > After this patch set, still find some printk()s left in
> > > arch/x86/kvm/*,
> > > consider clean all of them up?
> >
> > Hmm, yeah,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > After this patch set, still find some printk()s left in arch/x86/kvm/*,
> > consider clean all of them up?
>
> Hmm, yeah, I suppose at this point it makes sense to tack on a patch to clean
> them up.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, Robert Hoo wrote:
> After this patch set, still find some printk()s left in arch/x86/kvm/*,
> consider clean all of them up?
Hmm, yeah, I suppose at this point it makes sense to tack on a patch to clean
them up.
___
kvmarm mailing
On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 23:18 +, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Define pr_fmt using KBUILD_MODNAME for all KVM x86 code so that
> printks
> use consistent formatting across common x86, Intel, and AMD code. In
> addition to providing consistent print formatting, using
> KBUILD_MODNAME,
> e.g.
Define pr_fmt using KBUILD_MODNAME for all KVM x86 code so that printks
use consistent formatting across common x86, Intel, and AMD code. In
addition to providing consistent print formatting, using KBUILD_MODNAME,
e.g. kvm_amd and kvm_intel, allows referencing SVM and VMX (and SEV and
SGX and
