Salut Eric,
On 21/04/16 18:56, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 04:04 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Now that the interface between the arch timer and the VGIC does not
>> require passing the irq_phys_map entry pointer anymore, let's remove
>> it from the virtual arch timer and use the virtual IRQ
On 04/15/2016 04:04 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Now that the interface between the arch timer and the VGIC does not
> require passing the irq_phys_map entry pointer anymore, let's remove
> it from the virtual arch timer and use the virtual IRQ number instead
> directly.
> The remaining pointer
Now that the interface between the arch timer and the VGIC does not
require passing the irq_phys_map entry pointer anymore, let's remove
it from the virtual arch timer and use the virtual IRQ number instead
directly.
The remaining pointer returned by kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq() will be
removed in the