On 10/02/16 12:45, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:40:22AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Just like on GICv2, we're a bit hammer-happy with GICv3, and access
>> them more often than we should.
>>
>> Adopt a policy similar to what we do for GICv2, only save/restoring
>> the minim
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:40:22AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Just like on GICv2, we're a bit hammer-happy with GICv3, and access
> them more often than we should.
>
> Adopt a policy similar to what we do for GICv2, only save/restoring
> the minimal set of registers. As we don't access the regis
Just like on GICv2, we're a bit hammer-happy with GICv3, and access
them more often than we should.
Adopt a policy similar to what we do for GICv2, only save/restoring
the minimal set of registers. As we don't access the registers
linearly anymore (we may skip some), the convoluted accessors becom
