Re: [PATCH V8 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block

2017-02-15 Thread Baicar, Tyler
On 2/15/2017 5:13 AM, James Morse wrote: Hi Tyler, On 13/02/17 22:45, Baicar, Tyler wrote: On 2/9/2017 3:48 AM, James Morse wrote: On 01/02/17 17:16, Tyler Baicar wrote: From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" Even if an error status block's severity is fatal, the kernel

Re: [PATCH V8 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block

2017-02-15 Thread James Morse
Hi Tyler, On 13/02/17 22:45, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > On 2/9/2017 3:48 AM, James Morse wrote: >> On 01/02/17 17:16, Tyler Baicar wrote: >>> From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" >>> >>> Even if an error status block's severity is fatal, the kernel does not >>> honor the

Re: [PATCH V8 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block

2017-02-13 Thread Baicar, Tyler
Hello James, On 2/9/2017 3:48 AM, James Morse wrote: Hi Jonathan, Tyler, On 01/02/17 17:16, Tyler Baicar wrote: From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" Even if an error status block's severity is fatal, the kernel does not honor the severity level and panic. With the

Re: [PATCH V8 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block

2017-02-09 Thread James Morse
Hi Jonathan, Tyler, On 01/02/17 17:16, Tyler Baicar wrote: > From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" > > Even if an error status block's severity is fatal, the kernel does not > honor the severity level and panic. > > With the firmware first model, the platform could inform

[PATCH V8 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block

2017-02-01 Thread Tyler Baicar
From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" Even if an error status block's severity is fatal, the kernel does not honor the severity level and panic. With the firmware first model, the platform could inform the OS about a fatal hardware error through the non-NMI GHES notification