On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:18:38 +
Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 2/17/21 4:48 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> Using the UART devices at their legacy I/O addresses as set by IBM in
> >> 1981 was a kludge we used for
Hi Andre,
On 2/17/21 4:48 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Using the UART devices at their legacy I/O addresses as set by IBM in
>> 1981 was a kludge we used for simplicity on ARM platforms as well.
>> However this imposes problems due to th
Hi Andre,
On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Using the UART devices at their legacy I/O addresses as set by IBM in
> 1981 was a kludge we used for simplicity on ARM platforms as well.
> However this imposes problems due to their missing alignment and overlap
> with the PCI I/O address sp
Using the UART devices at their legacy I/O addresses as set by IBM in
1981 was a kludge we used for simplicity on ARM platforms as well.
However this imposes problems due to their missing alignment and overlap
with the PCI I/O address space.
Now that we can switch a device easily between using iop
