On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:00:18PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:17:34PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > We currently allocate an entry dynamically, but we never check if the
> > allocation actually succeeded. We actually don't need a dynamic
> > allocation, because
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:17:34PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> We currently allocate an entry dynamically, but we never check if the
> allocation actually succeeded. We actually don't need a dynamic
> allocation, because we know the maximum size of an ITS table entry, so
> we can simply use
On 13/10/17 14:17, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> We currently allocate an entry dynamically, but we never check if the
> allocation actually succeeded. We actually don't need a dynamic
> allocation, because we know the maximum size of an ITS table entry, so
> we can simply use an allocation on the
We currently allocate an entry dynamically, but we never check if the
allocation actually succeeded. We actually don't need a dynamic
allocation, because we know the maximum size of an ITS table entry, so
we can simply use an allocation on the stack.
Cc:
Signed-off-by: