Hi James,
I have changed the SEA/SEI injection method according you suggestion, but I
think this patch may also be needed.
Now for the SEI, the virtual ESR value is specified by the userspace. only RAS
extension support to set the virtual ESR value. so user space will check it to
decide whe
Dear, James
On 2017/5/9 1:31, James Morse wrote:
> Hi gengdongjiu,
>
> On 04/05/17 18:20, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> On 30/04/17 06:37, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
Handle kvmtool's detection for RAS extension, because sometimes
the APP needs to know the CPU's capacity
>>>
diff --git a/arch/arm
Hi gengdongjiu,
On 04/05/17 18:20, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> On 30/04/17 06:37, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
>>> Handle kvmtool's detection for RAS extension, because sometimes
>>> the APP needs to know the CPU's capacity
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
>>> index d9e9697..10
Hi James,
Thanks a lot for your comments.
2017-05-04 23:49 GMT+08:00 James Morse :
> Hi Dongjiu Geng,
>
> On 02/05/17 16:29, James Morse wrote:
>> I think we need a new API for injecting SError for SEI from Qemu/kvmtool,
>> but it
>> shouldn't be related to the RAS extensions. All v8.0 CPUs
Dear James,
>
> Hi Dongjiu Geng,
>
> On 30/04/17 06:37, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
>> Handle kvmtool's detection for RAS extension, because sometimes
>> the APP needs to know the CPU's capacity
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
>> index d9e9697..1004039 100644
>> --- a/ar
Hi Dongjiu Geng,
On 02/05/17 16:29, James Morse wrote:
> I think we need a new API for injecting SError for SEI from Qemu/kvmtool, but
> it
> shouldn't be related to the RAS extensions. All v8.0 CPUs have HCR_EL2.VSE, so
> we need to know KVM supports this API.
Thinking about this some more, it
Hi Paolo,
On 02/05/17 16:48, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/05/2017 09:56, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> The subject and description of these patches are also misleading.
>> Hopefully this is in no way tied to kvmtool, but to userspace
>> generically, for example also to be used by QEMU?
>
> Yes, QEMU
On 02/05/2017 09:56, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Dongjiu,
>
> Please send a cover letter for patch series with more than a single
> patch.
>
> The subject and description of these patches are also misleading.
> Hopefully this is in no way tied to kvmtool, but to userspace
> generically, for ex
Hi Dongjiu Geng,
On 30/04/17 06:37, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> Handle kvmtool's detection for RAS extension, because sometimes
> the APP needs to know the CPU's capacity
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index d9e9697..1004039 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++
Hi Christoffer,
thanks for your review and comments.
On 2017/5/2 15:56, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Dongjiu,
>
> Please send a cover letter for patch series with more than a single
> patch.
OK, got it.
>
> The subject and description of these patches are also misleading.
> Hopefully this i
Hi Christoffer,
thanks for your review and comments
On 2017/5/2 15:56, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Dongjiu,
>
> Please send a cover letter for patch series with more than a single
> patch.
OK, got it.
>
> The subject and description of these patches are also misleading.
> Hopefully this i
Hi Dongjiu,
Please send a cover letter for patch series with more than a single
patch.
The subject and description of these patches are also misleading.
Hopefully this is in no way tied to kvmtool, but to userspace
generically, for example also to be used by QEMU?
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 01:37:5
Handle kvmtool's detection for RAS extension, because sometimes
the APP needs to know the CPU's capacity
Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng
---
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 11 +++
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64
13 matches
Mail list logo
