Prior to v8.2's RAS Extensions, the HCR_EL2.VSE 'virtual SError' feature
generated an SError with an implementation defined ESR_EL1.ISS, because we
had no mechanism to specify the ESR value.
On Juno this generates an all-zero ESR, the most significant bit 'ISV'
is clear indicating the remainder of
Hi James,
After checking this patch, I think my patch[1] already include this
logic(only a little difference). In my first version patch [2], It sets the
virtual ESR in the KVM, but Marc and
other people disagree that[3][4],and propose to set its value and injection by
userspace(when RAS is
Hi gengdongjiu,
On 13/10/17 10:25, gengdongjiu wrote:
> After checking this patch, I think my patch[1] already include this
> logic(only a little
> difference).
Your kvm_handle_guest_sei() is similar to where this series ends up, but the
purpose of this patch is to keep KVMs existing behaviour.
Hi James,
Thanks for your mail.
> Hi gengdongjiu,
>
> On 13/10/17 10:25, gengdongjiu wrote:
> > After checking this patch, I think my patch[1] already include this
> > logic(only a little difference).
>
> Your kvm_handle_guest_sei() is similar to where this series ends up, but the
> purpose o
> In fact I have below method for that, what do you think about that?
>
> 1. If there is no RAS, old method, directly inject virtual SError, not need
> to specify ESR, as shown in the [1]
> 2. If there is RAS, KVM set "the kvm_run" guest exit type value to let user
> space handle the SError abo
Hi gengdongjiu,
On 16/10/17 04:17, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> In fact I have below method for that, what do you think about that?
>>
>> 1. If there is no RAS, old method, directly inject virtual SError, not need
>> to specify ESR, as shown in the [1]
>> 2. If there is RAS, KVM set "the kvm_run" gues
Hi gengdongjiu,
On 15/10/17 17:09, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> On 13/10/17 10:25, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> In my first version patch [2], It sets the virtual ESR in the KVM, but
>>> Marc and other people disagree that[3][4],and propose to set its value
>>> and injection by userspace(when RAS is enabled).
Hi James,
Thanks for your mail. and very sorry for my late response.
>
> Hi gengdongjiu,
>
> On 15/10/17 17:09, gengdongjiu wrote:
> >> On 13/10/17 10:25, gengdongjiu wrote:
> >>> In my first version patch [2], It sets the virtual ESR in the KVM,
> >>> but Marc and other people disagree that[
