On Tue, 11 May 2021 13:05:50 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport
>
> The arm64's version of pfn_valid() differs from the generic because of two
> reasons:
>
> * Parts of the memory map are freed during boot. This makes it necessary to
> verify that there is actual physical memor
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:40:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2021 13:05:50 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > From: Mike Rapoport
> >
> > The arm64's version of pfn_valid() differs from the generic because of two
> > reasons:
> >
> > * Parts of the memory map are freed during
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 12:06, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> From: Mike Rapoport
>
> The arm64's version of pfn_valid() differs from the generic because of two
> reasons:
>
> * Parts of the memory map are freed during boot. This makes it necessary to
> verify that there is actual physical memory that
From: Mike Rapoport
The arm64's version of pfn_valid() differs from the generic because of two
reasons:
* Parts of the memory map are freed during boot. This makes it necessary to
verify that there is actual physical memory that corresponds to a pfn
which is done by querying memblock.
* The
