From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
The comment only applied to SPE on non-VHE systems, so we simply remove
it.
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index d60d3a018882..fd845dda007a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -410,10 +410,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
__fpsimd_restore_state(&host_ctxt->gp_regs.fp_regs);
}
- /*
- * This must come after restoring the host sysregs, since a non-VHE
- * system may enable SPE here and make use of the TTBRs.
- */
__debug_switch_to_host(vcpu);
return exit_code;
--
2.14.2
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
