Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Improve efficiency of stage2 page table

2021-02-24 Thread wangyanan (Y)
On 2021/2/25 1:20, Alexandru Elisei wrote: Hi, On 2/24/21 2:35 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote: Hi Alex, On 2021/2/23 23:55, Alexandru Elisei wrote: Hi Yanan, I wanted to review the patches, but unfortunately I get an error when trying to apply the first patch in the series: Applying: KVM:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Improve efficiency of stage2 page table

2021-02-24 Thread Alexandru Elisei
Hi, On 2/24/21 2:35 AM, wangyanan (Y) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On 2021/2/23 23:55, Alexandru Elisei wrote: >> Hi Yanan, >> >> I wanted to review the patches, but unfortunately I get an error when trying >> to >> apply the first patch in the series: >> >> Applying: KVM: arm64: Move the clean of

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Improve efficiency of stage2 page table

2021-02-23 Thread wangyanan (Y)
Hi Alex, On 2021/2/23 23:55, Alexandru Elisei wrote: Hi Yanan, I wanted to review the patches, but unfortunately I get an error when trying to apply the first patch in the series: Applying: KVM: arm64: Move the clean of dcache to the map handler error: patch failed:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Improve efficiency of stage2 page table

2021-02-23 Thread Alexandru Elisei
Hi Yanan, I wanted to review the patches, but unfortunately I get an error when trying to apply the first patch in the series: Applying: KVM: arm64: Move the clean of dcache to the map handler error: patch failed: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c:464 error: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c: patch does

[RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Improve efficiency of stage2 page table

2021-02-08 Thread Yanan Wang
Hi, This series makes some efficiency improvement of stage2 page table code, and there are some test results to present the performance changes, which were tested by a kvm selftest [1] that I have post: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208090841.333724-1-wangyana...@huawei.com/ About