On 14/02/17 00:44, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
>
> On 01/17/2017 04:20 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When we don't have the DirectLPI feature, we must work around the
>> architecture shortcomings to be able to perform the required
>> invalidation.
>>
>> For this, we create a fake device w
Hi Marc,
On 01/17/2017 04:20 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
When we don't have the DirectLPI feature, we must work around the
architecture shortcomings to be able to perform the required
invalidation.
For this, we create a fake device whose sole purpose is to
provide a way to issue a map/inv/unmap se
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When we don't have the DirectLPI feature, we must work around the
> architecture shortcomings to be able to perform the required
> invalidation.
>
> For this, we create a fake device whose sole purpose is to
> provide a way to issue a map/inv/unmap sequen
When we don't have the DirectLPI feature, we must work around the
architecture shortcomings to be able to perform the required
invalidation.
For this, we create a fake device whose sole purpose is to
provide a way to issue a map/inv/unmap sequence (and the corresponding
sync operations). That's 6
