On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Jintack Lim wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:51:13AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:51:13AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> > Hi Jintack,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Jintack Lim
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:51:13AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Hi Jintack,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> >> The ARM architecture defines the EL1 physical timer and the virtual
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jintack Lim wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> Hi Jintack,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
>>> The ARM architecture defines the EL1 physical timer and
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Jintack,
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
>> The ARM architecture defines the EL1 physical timer and the virtual timer,
>> and it is reasonable for an OS to expect to be able to access
Hi Jintack,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> The ARM architecture defines the EL1 physical timer and the virtual timer,
> and it is reasonable for an OS to expect to be able to access both.
> However, the current KVM implementation does not provide the EL1 physical
>
The ARM architecture defines the EL1 physical timer and the virtual timer,
and it is reasonable for an OS to expect to be able to access both.
However, the current KVM implementation does not provide the EL1 physical
timer to VMs but terminates VMs on access to the timer.
This patch series