Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] LO Pootle

2011-01-03 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Martin, On 2010-12-30 at 10:36 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: > The Slovenian team will be working with sdf files (we have our own > localization system that works with sdf, splits to po-s and finalizes > back to sdf), so -1 from me. What exactly your system that works with sdf does? Is it

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] LO Pootle

2011-01-03 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Ok, Kendy, I can upload po's in a zip, if that is fine for you. But I do not want to check in stuff etc. I would like to either give you a download link like for OOo where they download from predefined addresses for dev, 3.3, 3.2.1 etc. or I could ftp automagically to some site; it does not need to

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] LO Pootle

2011-01-03 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
2011/1/3 Martin Srebotnjak > Ok, Kendy, I can upload po's in a zip, if that is fine for you. But I do > not want to check in stuff etc. I would like to either give you a download > link like for OOo where they download from predefined addresses for dev, > 3.3, 3.2.1 etc. or I could ftp automagica

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] LO Pootle

2011-01-03 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andras, On 2010-12-30 at 09:13 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: > > BTW - would it help you if we got rid of the sdf files, and instead we > > had .po files in the l10n git repository? [For sure it would help us > > who work with the git repos, because the sdf file format is just > > something incr

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] LO Pootle

2011-01-04 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Martin, On 2011-01-03 at 20:25 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: > > Ok, Kendy, I can upload po's in a zip, if that is fine for you. But I do > > not want to check in stuff etc. I would like to either give you a download > > link like for OOo where they download from predefined addresses for dev