Hello @ll,
sorry for bother you again, but in the above mentioned unit
(https://translations.documentfoundation.org/de/libo_help/translate.html#unit=40270452)
I found the following text with my parallel installed LO Version:
4.1.0.0.beta2+
Build ID: 5ae6803a21f5e2b6e107ee405e9b3346105c646
Tinde
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> Hello @ll,
> sorry for bother you again, but in the above mentioned unit
> (https://translations.documentfoundation.org/de/libo_help/translate.html#unit=40270452)
> I found the following text with my parallel installed LO Version:
> 4.1.0.0.
Hi Thomas,
On 13/06/2013 18:22, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> Hello @ll,
> sorry for bother you again, but in the above mentioned unit
> (https://translations.documentfoundation.org/de/libo_help/translate.html#unit=40270452)
>
> I found the following text with my parallel installed LO Version:
> 4.1.
Hi :)
The quote is a real mess. It looks like some contortion i might write on a bad
day. How about going for a total re-write? Something like
"ODF 1.2 (Extended)(compat) is written to be more compatible with ODF 1.0 and
1.1 files, as well as with files that use plain ODF 1.2 without the Exte
Hi *,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> Hello @ll,
> sorry for bother you again, but in the above mentioned unit
>
>
> With several legacy pre-ODF1.2 and ODF1.2-only consumers out there,
> users wanted a more backward-compatible ODF 1.2 extended mode, that
> uses stuff dep
Hi Thomas, list,
sorry for being late to the show -
Thomas Hackert wrote:
>
> With several legacy pre-ODF1.2 and ODF1.2-only consumers out there,
> users wanted a more backward-compatible ODF 1.2 extended mode, that
> uses stuff deprecated in 1.2, and/or is 'bug-compatible' to older
> OpenOff
