Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [Pootle] Translation help for unit 40270452

2013-06-23 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Thomas, list, sorry for being late to the show - Thomas Hackert wrote: quote With several legacy pre-ODF1.2 and ODF1.2-only consumers out there, users wanted a more backward-compatible ODF 1.2 extended mode, that uses stuff deprecated in 1.2, and/or is 'bug-compatible' to older

[libreoffice-l10n] [Pootle] Translation help for unit 40270452

2013-06-13 Thread Thomas Hackert
Hello @ll, sorry for bother you again, but in the above mentioned unit (https://translations.documentfoundation.org/de/libo_help/translate.html#unit=40270452) I found the following text with my parallel installed LO Version: 4.1.0.0.beta2+ Build ID: 5ae6803a21f5e2b6e107ee405e9b3346105c646

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [Pootle] Translation help for unit 40270452

2013-06-13 Thread Andras Timar
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Thomas Hackert thack...@nexgo.de wrote: Hello @ll, sorry for bother you again, but in the above mentioned unit (https://translations.documentfoundation.org/de/libo_help/translate.html#unit=40270452) I found the following text with my parallel installed LO

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [Pootle] Translation help for unit 40270452

2013-06-13 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Thomas, On 13/06/2013 18:22, Thomas Hackert wrote: Hello @ll, sorry for bother you again, but in the above mentioned unit (https://translations.documentfoundation.org/de/libo_help/translate.html#unit=40270452) I found the following text with my parallel installed LO Version:

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [Pootle] Translation help for unit 40270452

2013-06-13 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) The quote is a real mess.  It looks like some contortion i might write on a bad day.  How about going for a total re-write?  Something like ODF 1.2 (Extended)(compat) is written to be more compatible with ODF 1.0 and 1.1 files, as well as with files that use plain ODF 1.2 without the