Humm, I've never heard of this news outlet before, but it at least is
trying to supply data instead of sound bytes to be repeated.

Some things make sense, like the past and present gas attack announcements
claiming it is Assad, came from Saudi Prince Bandar's sources, even though
all past investigations show it came from Bandar's Terrorist (not
Revolutionists) forces.

Scott
http://www.mintpressnews.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Patrick Martin
2 September 2013

A report by Minneapolis-based Mint Press News (MPN) links the chemical
weapons attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta to US-backed opposition
forces fighting the Syrian regime. This flatly contradicts unsubstantiated
US allegations (Lies) that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is responsible
for the Ghouta attack-the claim Washington is using as its pretext to attack
Syria.

MPN published an article with
<http://www.mintpressnews.com/witnesses-of-gas-attack-say-saudis-supplied-re
bels-with-chemical-weapons/168135/> interviews with opposition fighters on
the ground in Ghouta. Its two authors are Jordanian freelance journalist
Yahya Ababneh and Dale Gavlak-a longtime correspondent for the Associated
Press, based in Amman, Jordan for more than two decades, who currently
reports for AP and National Public Radio, as well as MPN.

Those interviewed included Abu Abdel-Moneim, whose son was among 13
opposition fighters killed in a tunnel used to store what were apparently
chemical weapons by the 'rebels'.

Abdel-Moneim said the weapons were supplied by a Saudi named Abu Ayesha, who
leads a rebel battalion. He described some of the weapons as having a
"tube-like structure," while others were like a "huge gas bottle." They were
stored in tunnels, while the opposition fighters themselves slept in nearby
mosques and private homes.

A female fighter who spoke with the news service complained, "They didn't
tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We didn't know they were
chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons."

She added, "When Saudi Prince Bandar gives such weapons to people, he must
give them to those who know how to handle and use them."

Prince Bandar is the former longtime Saudi ambassador to the United States,
who returned from decades in Washington, where he had close ties to the US
military-intelligence apparatus as the head of the Saudi intelligence
service. He is reportedly the main Saudi sponsor, fundraiser and arms
supplier for Syrian opposition forces. At least a dozen opposition fighters
interviewed in the MPN report said they were on the payroll of Saudi Arabia.

An opposition leader in Ghouta told MPN that the Al Nusra Front, one of the
main Islamic fundamentalist militias operating in Syria, had custody of the
chemical weapons. "They do not share secret information. They merely used
some ordinary rebels to carry and operate this material," he said. "We were
very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the fighters
handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions."

Besides the MPN report, a report in Germany's taz newspaper also links the
opposition forces to chemical weapons attacks. The taz posted the
<http://blogs.taz.de/datenscheich/2013/08/29/bin-snowden-und-scheich-ali-ass
ange/> transcript of an intercepted telephone conversation
<https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=194251300748520&set=vb.351787554837509
&type=2&theater> posted on Facebook between an Al Nusra fighter in Syria and
a financier in the US-allied Persian Gulf sheikhdom of Qatar.

Trying to convince the financier that his forces are in a strong position to
attack and retake the city of Homs, the Al Nusra fighter says: "Brother, we
got as far as [redacted], and we fired chemical weapons, my brother."

After a pause, the Qatari financier replies: "Yes, I have been informed of
that. Give me the details, prepare them, and tell me how I should transfer
the money."

There has been no effort to respond to, explain or rebut these reports by
the US government or the US media.

According to the British newspaper Independent, Saudi intelligence-headed by
Prince Bandar-was the first to allege use of Sarin gas by the Syrian
military, in communications to the US and other imperialist powers in
February. At the time, UN commissioner Carla del Ponte looked into the
charges and concluded that it was the rebels who had used chemical weapons,
not the Syrian government.









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to