Mark Trahant:  Indian Country stuck in  permanent recession

Last week the Bureau of Labor Statistics started a frenzy when it released its 
latest job report, showing that only 54,000 jobs were added to the economy in 
May.



The White House says don’t worry too much about those numbers; it only 
represents one month. Austan Goolsbee, chairman of the Council of Economic 
Advisers, told The Associated Press
 that the addition of a million new jobs over the past six months shows 
“we have improved a long way from when the economy was in rescue mode.”


That’s true. And, I think the White House ought to get more credit for 
keeping the economy from falling off the cliff. But at the same time, 
the future prospects for job creation are bleak. Why? The Republicans 
are demanding a policy of major government contraction while the White 
House is “negotiating” for a policy for some contraction. Either way all
 governments are shrinking. The economy is going to lose a you-know-what
 load of jobs or a mega-load of jobs. Either way there are a lot of 
minus-signs ahead.



The May jobs report hints at what’s to come. First, it said, long-term 
unemployed -- those out of work for 27 weeks or more -- continued to 
grow by 361,000 to 6.2 million people and “their share of unemployment 
increased to 45.1 percent,” the BLS said.



So what’s the government doing for the long-term unemployed? Not a damn 
thing. The overriding idea is that some magical private sector beans are
 going to be planted soon and grow jobs for millions of people.



At the same time the numbers of long-term unemployed continue to grow, 
the government sector is cutting its own workforce. Big time. 
“Employment in local government continued to decline over the month, ” 
the report said.
Local government lost 28,000 jobs last month and 
446,000 jobs since a peak in September 2008. That’s just the beginning. 
If the trillion dollars worth of cuts demanded by Republicans come into 
being those job losses will look small by comparison.


Another industry hit by government contraction: Construction. When 
government at all levels cuts back on infrastructure, there are fewer 
jobs building roads, schools, buildings. Here is what the Bureau of 
Labor Statistics report says about that: “Construction employment was 
essentially unchanged in May. Employment in the industry has shown 
little movement on net since early 2010, after having fallen sharply 
during the 2007-09 period.”



How does Indian Country fit into this picture? That’s a tough question 
to answer because so much of the data is old and often unreliable. (More
 than ever: Indian Country needs real time data, but that’s another 
column.) But we do know for certain that unemployment is significantly 
higher in American Indian and Alaska Native communities.

 

The Bureau of Indian Affairs’ Population and Labor Force Report
 pegs it at near 50 percent nationally (showing South Dakota with the 
highest unemployment rate at 83 percent of the adult workforce). While a
 report last year by the Economic Policy Institute,
 using a different methodology, showed an unemployment rate of 21.3 
percent in the first half of 2010. (EPI also found unemployment rates 
significantly higher in the Great Plains.)



Of course the problem with all of those numbers -- bleak as they are -- 
is that they look backward, not forward. What are the prospects for 
Indian Country in this new environment of contraction? 



Remember government, at all levels, is in a job-cutting mode. Tribal and
 village governments have spent the past decade essentially creating 
jobs both in government and in the private sector (but even private 
jobs, are often tied to government through construction and other 
infrastructure projects). The problem is those jobs have not kept up 
with an expanding population because Indian Country is a younger 
workforce.



When it comes to jobs -- nationally and in Indian Country -- there is an
 insurmountable mathematical obstacle. The more jobs that are cut by the
 government, mean that many more must be created to put the long-term 
unemployed back to work.



It’s been said that Indian Country is in a permanent recession. But the 
sad truth is it could get a lot worse -- and it’s a path we’re on right 
now.



Mark Trahant is a writer, speaker and Twitter poet. He is a member of the 
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and lives in Fort Hall, Idaho. Trahant’s new book, “The 
Last Great Battle of the 
Indian Wars,” is the story of Sen. Henry Jackson and Forrest Gerard.

http://64.38.12.138/News/2011/001866.asp


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to