From: Peter Koechley, MoveOn.org Civic Action
[mailto:moveon-h...@list.moveon.org]
<mailto:%5bmailto:moveon-h...@list.moveon.org%5d> 


Subject: This could be big

Dear MoveOn member,

A few weeks ago, Senator Bernie Sanders released a list of the 10 companies
worst at paying their fair share in taxes. We liked it, and our designer
Gabe quickly put it into chart form and put it up on our website.

What happened next was exciting: Tens of thousands of people started sharing
the chart on Facebook. Blogs started posting links to it. It began to really
blow up-and that gave us an idea: What if we could get this popular chart in
front of millions of people today as they're finishing their taxes?

So here we go: We're going to try to saturate Facebook with the chart below,
so that everyone sees the shameful behavior of these 10 companies. Can you
join in? All you have to do is click
<http://www.moveon.org/r?r=207868&id=27005-7187494-CVzeKxx&t=1>  this button
to share it:


 


 <http://www.moveon.org/r?r=207868&id=27005-7187494-CVzeKxx&t=2> Share This
on Facebook

 

 <http://www.moveon.org/r?r=207868&id=27005-7187494-CVzeKxx&t=3> Senator
Bernie Sanders Guide To Corporate FreeloadersClick
<http://www.moveon.org/r?r=207868&id=27005-7187494-CVzeKxx&t=4>  here to
share: Bernie Sanders' Guide to Corporate Freeloaders


Thanks for all you do,

-Peter, Eli, Alicia, Jenine, Gabriel, and the whole MoveOn.org Civic Action
team

  _____  

 

.  CONNECT THE DOTS today: 7AM to 8AM. - Copy at the bottom

 

***

 

From: Joseph Maizlish 



http://robertreich.org/

 

Why Obama's Proposal Is Risky

 

" But there's one big weakness. The whole thing depends on the recovery 

picking up steam. If the economy doesn't, the process could backfire - 

leading to indiscriminate budget cuts later on, as well as big cuts in 

Medicare. Indeed, if the recovery fails to fire up, Obama's own chance 

of reelection is dimmed considerably, as are the odds of a Democratic 

House after 2012."

 

By Robert Reich, April 16, 2011 

 

Paul Ryan says his budget plan will cut $4.4 trillion over ten years. 

The President says his new plan will cut $4 trillion over twelve years.

 

Let's get real. Ten or twelve-year budgets are baloney. It's hard enough 

to forecast budgets a year or two into the future. Between now and 2022 

or 2024 the economy will probably have gone through a recovery (I'll 

explain later why I fear it will be anemic at best) and another 

downturn. America will also have been through a bunch of elections - at 

least five congressional and three presidential.

 

The practical question is how to get out of the ongoing gravitational 

pull of this awful recession without kow-towing to extremists on the 

right who think the U.S. government is their mortal enemy. For President 

Obama, it's also about how to get reelected.

 

(Yes, we also have to send a clear signal to global lenders that America 

is serious about reducing its long-term budget deficit. But in truth, 

global lenders don't need much reassurance. Bond market yields in the 

U.S. are now lower than they were when the government was running a 

budget surplus ten years ago.)

 

Seen in this light, Obama's plan isn't really a budget proposal. It's a 

process proposal.

 

Stage 1, starting now and ending in June, requires that Republican and 

Democratic leaders devise a budget for 2012. Apparently they've already 

agreed to try.

 

That budget would also include a "framework" for deficit reduction over 

the longer haul. But that framework will be mainly for show. It will 

give House Republicans enough cover to vote to raise the ceiling on the 

amount the U.S. government can borrow. (The vote has to occur before the 

Treasury runs out of accounting maneuvers, in early July.)

 

And because the framework's details will be filled in after Election 

Day, it will give Obama wiggle room before the election to campaign on 

his priorities. If he wins big - and if Democrats retake the House - its 

details will look completely different from what they'd look like in the 

alternative.

 

Stage 2 occurs in 2014 - fully two years after Election Day. Then, 

according to Obama's proposal, if the ratio of the nation's deficit to 

the GDP hasn't fallen to 2.5 percent (it's now over 10 percent), 

automatic across-the-board cuts will go into effect to get it there.

 

Importantly, these cuts wouldn't apply to Social Security and Medicare, 

or to Medicaid and other programs designed for the poor. And they 

wouldn't be limited to spending. They'd also apply to tax expenditures - 

that is, to tax deductions and tax credits.

 

The betting in the White House is that by 2014 the recovery will be in 

full force, and the economy will have grown so much that the ratio of 

deficit to the GDP will be in the range of 3 to 5 percent anyway. That 

means any across-the-board cuts wouldn't have to be very deep.

 

The White House is also betting that a strong recovery will take the 

sting out of any recommendations to slow the growth of Medicare spending 

emanating from the Medicare board set up under the new health care law 

(officially known as the Independent Payment Advisory Board.) Under 

Obama's new plan, such proposals will be necessary if Medicare spending 

grows .5 percent faster than growth of the economy (under the law, it's 

1 percent faster).

 

All told, it's a clever strategy. It might well avoid a dangerous game 

of chicken over raising the debt ceiling. It still allows the President 

to charge Paul Ryan and other Republicans who join him as ending 

Medicare as we know it - which they are, in fact, proposing to do. (This 

may help Democrats win back seniors, whose support for Democratic house 

candidates dropped form 49% in 2006 to 38% in 2010.) And it gives the 

President lots of room to maneuver between now and Election Day, and 

between Election Day and 2014.

 

But there's one big weakness. The whole thing depends on the recovery 

picking up steam. If the economy doesn't, the process could backfire - 

leading to indiscriminate budget cuts later on, as well as big cuts in 

Medicare. Indeed, if the recovery fails to fire up, Obama's own chance 

of reelection is dimmed considerably, as are the odds of a Democratic 

House after 2012.

 

Yet what are the chances of a booming recovery? The economy is now 

growing at an annualized rate of only 1.5 percent. That's pitiful. It's 

not nearly enough to bring down the rate of unemployment, or remove the 

danger of a double dip. Real wages continue to drop. Housing prices 

continue to drop. Food and gas prices are rising. Consumer confidence is 

still in the basement.

 

By focusing the public's attention on the budget deficit, the President 

is still playing on the Republican's field. By advancing his own "twelve 

year plan" for reducing it - without talking about the economy's 

underlying problem - he appears to validate their big lie that reducing 

the deficit is the key to future prosperity.

 

 

The underlying problem isn't the budget deficit. It's that so much 

income and wealth are going to the top that most Americans don't have 

the purchasing power to sustain a strong recovery.

 

Until steps are taken to alter this fundamental imbalance - for example, 

exempting the first $20K of income from payroll taxes while lifting the 

cap on income subject to payroll taxes, raising income and capital gains 

taxes on millionaires and using the revenues to expand the Earned Income 

Tax Credit up to incomes of $50,000, strengthening labor unions, and so 

on - a strong recovery may not be possible.

 

Robert Reich

 

Robert Reich's Blog

 

***

 

Lila Garrett (Host of CONNECT THE DOTS)

KPFK 90.7 FM in LA; 98.7 Santa Barbara; 93.7 San Diego 

Mondays - 7AM to 8AM.

 

To pod cast or download the broadcast just use this link:

http://archive.kpfk.org/parchive/index.php?shokey=ctd

 

Each show is online for three months.

 

War in Afghanistan alone is costing us over 2 billion a week.  Author David
Swanson challenges Oblama to stop our 3 wars if he really wants to solve the
deficit.  He questions the necessity of the Civil War, whether the U.S. is
too big to maintain a democracy and he touches on the logic of state
secession.   

 

Robert Greenwald, of Brave new Films, tells us what percentage of our
personal tax dollars goes to maintain our wars and more.

 

Journalist John Nichols gives us an update on Wisconsin voter fraud, recalls
of State Senators and new trouble for Republican Gov. Scott Walker.

 

Lila Garrett (Host of CONNECT THE DOTS)

KPFK 90.7 FM in LA;  98.7 Santa Barbara

Airs Mondays from 7AM to 8AM.

To pod cast or download the broadcast just use this link:

http://archive.kpfk.org/parchive/index.php?shokey=ctd

 

Each show is online for three months. 

Copyright (C) 2011 Lila Garrett All rights reserved.   

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to