*Oh Scot*
*
*
*Your ignorance is showing or is it that the pole from the caber toss hit
you in the head too many times at the Highland games... [?]*
*
*
*Rojo Rojito*
*
*
*Cort*
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:56 PM, scotpe...@cruzio.com wrote:
Who, pray tell, is Shrooms, much less who is this
Who, pray tell, is Shrooms, much less who is this person (or organization)
working for?
And why does this sound like I'm reading something on the PNAC site?
Scott
Therefore strategies for dealing with, and opposing, the Muslim
Brotherhood should be fundamentally different from our approach to
Educators do not use ad hominem attacks and strawman arguments. Only those
supporting agendas and using the little back book of disinformation rely
on those tactics to distract people from the questions at hand, which was
in this instance, seriosuly, it reads like it came right off a PNAC funded
So your saying that your writing a Shrooms as a Ghost writers name? I was
discussing the article, not issuing an ad hominem comment (unless you are
Shrroms? It appears this might be another of your names), when you respond
with a personal attack. Of course, those who read my initial post would
Yes, the writer is supportive of Foreign intervention by the US, Saudi
Arabia and Israel.
I've been trying to point that out, to have a discussion on this from your
initial posts about Assad and Regime change in Syria and who should be
responsible for this, who it is that is being co-opted so
You are mistaken in that supporting western intervention (you do read the
articles you send don't you?) you can't even state what you think is
wrong, you simply issue personal attacks.
So that brings me to finally stating, since you obviously don't read all
of my
posts before responding ad
