The killing of innocent civilians in 
faroff places may not be noticed by Americans.  Drone attacks and the 
dozens of people killed in them are ignored on the American MSM, but 
that doesn't mean they aren't occurring.  The war on the Middle East is 
lucrative for defense contractors, but Americans will pay the price, not
 only in the taxes and deficits which this war engenders, but--more 
importantly--in the hatred of America which these unnecessary deaths 
engender.  
-- Hajja Romi

"Where is Your Democracy?"
  The Age of Predators
  By KATHY KELLY

  On May 5, 2011, CNN 
World News asked whether killing Osama bin Laden was legal under 
international law.  Other news commentary has questioned whether it 
would have been both possible and advantageous to bring Osama bin Laden 
to trial rather than kill him. 

 
  World attention has been focused, however briefly, 
on questions of legality regarding the killing of Osama bin Laden.  But,
 with the increasing use of Predator drones to kill suspected "high 
value targets" in Pakistan and Afghanistan, extrajudicial killings by 
U.S. military forces have become the new norm.

  Just three days after Osama bin Laden was killed, an
 attack employing remote-control aerial drones killed fifteen people in 
Pakistan and wounded four.    Last month, a drone attack killed 44 
people in Pakistan’s tribal region. CNN reports that their Islamabad 
bureau has counted four drone strikes over the last month and a half. 
Friday's suspected drone strike was the 21st this year.  There were 111 
strikes in 2010.  The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan estimated that
 957 innocent civilians were killed in 2010.

  I’m reminded of an encounter I had, in May, 2010 
,when a journalist and a social worker from North Waziristan met with a 
small Voices for Creative Nonviolence delegation in Pakistan  and 
described, in gory and graphic detail, the scenes of drone attacks which
 they had personally witnessed:  the carbonized bodies, burned so fully 
they could be identified by legs and hands alone, the bystanders sent 
flying like dolls through the air to break, with shattered bones and 
sometimes-fatal brain injuries, upon walls and stone.  
  “Do Americans know about the drones?” the journalist asked me.  


  I said I thought that awareness was growing on University campuses and among 
peace groups.  


  “This isn’t what I’m asking,” he politely insisted. 
 “What I want to know is if average Americans know that their country is
 attacking Pakistan with drones that carry bombs.  Do they know this?” 


  “Truthfully,” I said, “I don’t think so.” 


  “Where is your democracy?” he asked me. “Where is your democracy?”

  Ideally, in a democracy, people are educated about 
important matters, and they can influence decisions about these issues 
by voting for people who represent their point of view.  


  Only a handful of U.S. officials have broached the 
issue of whether or not it is right for the U.S. to use unmanned aerial 
vehicles to function as prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner in the 
decision to assassinate anyone designated as a “high value target” in 
faraway Pakistan or Afghanistan.  


  Would we want unmanned aerial vehicles piloted by 
another country to fly over the U.S., targeting individuals deemed to be
 a threat to the safety of their people, firing Hellfire missiles or 
dropping 500 pound bombs over suspected “high value targets” on the 
hunch of a soldier or general without evidence and without any 
consideration of which innocent civilians will also be killed?  


  Fully informed citizens might be invited to consider
 the Golden Rule of “do unto others as you would have them do unto you,”
 but they would certainly be involved in the debate over how we will be 
treated in future years and decades when these weapons have 
proliferated. In 1945, only one country possessed the atomic bomb, but 
within decades, the “nuclear club” had expanded to five declared and 
four non-declared nuclear-armed states in a much less certain world.  
Besides the risk of nuclear war, this weapon proliferation has consumed 
resources that could have been directed toward feeding a hungry world or
 eradicating disease or easing the effects of impoverishment.

  As of now, worldwide, 49 companies make over 150 
different drone aircraft.  Drone merchants expect that drone sales will 
earn $20.2 billion over the next 10 years for aerospace war 
manufacturers, with 20.6 billion spent on Research and Development.  Who
 knows? One day drone missiles may be aimed at us. 


  Also worth noting is the observation that drones 
will make it politically convenient for any country to order military 
actions without risking their soldiers’ lives, thereby making it easier,
 and more tempting, to start wars which may eventually escalate to 
result in massive loss of life, both military and civilian.

  Voices for Creative Nonviolence believes that 
standing alongside people who bear the brunt of our wars helps us gain 
needed insights.  Where you stand determines what you see. 
  In October and again in December of 2010, while in 
Afghanistan, I met with a large family living in a wretched refugee 
camp. They had fled their homes in the San Gin district of the Helmand 
Province after a drone attack killed a mother there and her five 
children. The woman’s husband showed us photos of his children’s 
bloodied corpses. His niece, Juma Gul, age 9, had survived the attack. 
She and I huddled next to each other inside a hut made of mud on a 
chilly December morning. Juma Gul’s father stooped in front of us and 
gently unzipped her jacket, showing me that his daughter’s arm had been 
amputated by shrapnel when the U.S. missile hit their home in San Gin. 


  Next to Juma Gul was her brother, whose leg had been
 mangled in the attack. He apparently has no access to adequate medical 
care and experiences constant pain.
  It's impossible to conjecture what would have 
happened had Osama bin Laden been apprehended and brought to appear 
before a court of law, charged with crimes against humanity because of 
his alleged role in masterminding the 9/11 attacks.  But, I feel certain
 beyond doubt that Juma Gul posed no threat whatsoever to the U.S., and 
if she were brought before a court of law and witnesses were helped to 
understand that she was attacked by a U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle for 
no reason other than that she happened to live in proximity to a 
potential high value target, she would be vindicated of any suspicion 
that she committed a crime.  The same might not be true for those who 
attacked her.

  Kathy Kelly (ka...@vcnv.org) co-coordinates Voices for Creative Nonviolence. 
Visit www.vcnv.org for a resource packet on drone warfare 
http://vcnv.org/drone-resisting-sanitized-remote-control-death
http://www.counterpunch.org/kelly05092011.html



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to