Hi. I need to make a correction and apologea of this morning's mailing.
I originally intended sending the article below as well as a Guardian report
of the mortar attack in Mozul. I scan the LA Times maybe 30 minutes
before I send my mailings, saw that story as the headline and realized I
needed to send something different. So, as I'd saved the politics of Xmas,
I quickly scanned and added the just-received 'Because we are Jews' piece
and just sent it off. Too quickly, I regret to say. I missed it's conclusions.
I do not believe it is conceivable, realistic or wise to work for establishment
of one hegemonic Palestinian state or vaguely expect Israelis to give up
soveirgnty. I don't know whether working for two states or one secularized
state is the more realizable transitional goal but definitely think the goal of
the article is misguided and counter-productive. And you pretty much know
the rest of what I believe and work for. Here now, is my afternoon mailing:
Ed
The Enemies Among Us
by Mike Whitney
"Progressive Trail" -- 12/20/04
The new Intelligence reform bill is a more stunning attack on the Bill of
Rights than the Patriot Act. Most people have no idea how dramatically their
"inalienable" rights have been savaged, or to what extent the Congress has sold
them out. It's no exaggeration to say that the foundation of personal liberty,
guaranteed in the law, is cracking at the base. It'll be a miracle if we can
put it back together in time to pass it on to our children.
As usual, the role of the media has been pivotal in obfuscating the details of
the bill. They've fed the hysteria over the establishment of a NID; (National
Intelligence Director) a glamour position that has been represented as vital to
stopping another 9-11. What rubbish. Teaching Condi Rice how to read a simple
e-mail from bin Laden would be twice as effective.
The media has done little to expose the real nature of the conflict between the
Pentagon and the 9-11 panel. That battle was a straightforward "turf war" that
threatened to take a chunk of money away from Rumsfeld, who presently gets 80%
of the Intelligence budget. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) defended Rumsfeld by
claiming that "battlefield operations" would be endangered if the bill passed.
It was nonsensical argument reflective of Hunter's indebtedness to the Defense
industry (Dig around the internet and you'll find that Hunter is even more of a
corporate streetwalker than most of his peers) As for Rumsfeld, he just wants
his $32 billion, so that he can persist in bankrolling his clandestine
detention centers, death squads and propaganda facilities (now called strategic
intelligence). In reality, Rumsfeld is conducting his own secret government,
and has been for some time. That takes money, and lots of it.
The creation of the NID is an appalling idea. It puts all 14 intelligence
agencies UNDER A POLITICAL APPOINTEE, which is an invitation for disaster. We
all know how corrupted information was before the Iraq war; imagine what it
will look like after it travels through the executive sausage-making unit. It's
unlikely that anything remotely resembling the truth will ever emerge from the
Bush White House.
The new bill creates a new national ID card ("Let me see your papers") by
federalizing driver's licenses. The plan is to establish federal guidelines in
the design of licenses that can be used as a means for tracking people. These
standards are unnecessary unless the government is developing a social strategy
that is so heinous that it's bound to generate more enemies. The increased
repression and the greater disparity in personal wealth suggest that this is
the case.
Democracy Now elaborates on the new national ID: "There's all sorts of new
technologies that could be incorporated into the driver's license to link it to
all sorts of public and private-sector databases. And you could also imagine
putting an RFID chip in the license that would allow it to be tracked remotely.
So, this is something the 9/11 commission had actually recommended be done,
that the driver's license should be something like an internal passport of the
sort that we've seen in the Soviet Union in the past, and although the Congress
wasn't willing to explicitly go that far, they have laid the groundwork for
that kind of checkpoint society in the future."
Did you hear any complaints from Congress over this hallmark of fascist's
regimes?
The Intel bill also creates a "Civil Liberties Board" charged with
investigating whether the new legislation adversely affects civil rights.
Regrettably, the board is a complete sham. It has no subpoena power and is
subordinate to the NID, the President and the Attorney General. In other words,
it's merely a public relations ploy intended to conceal the bill's harsher
measures (Undoubtedly, this "Board" will be used by Bush to defend his
steadfast concern for civil liberties)
The powers of the FISA court have also been seriously expanded. The Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act basically allows the secret court to overturn the
"probable cause" provision of the 4th Amendment in the investigation of terror
suspects. John Ashcroft gravely abused the statute by extending it to the
surveillance of identity-theft suspects and drug traffickers (Ashcroft actually
boasted to Congress about the success of using the Patriot Act to apprehend
criminals who were entirely unrelated to terrorism. He obviously considered the
4th Amendment nothing more than an unnecessary nuisance) Now the law has been
expanded to include a "lone wolf" provision; supposedly aimed at an individual
terrorist acting without the support of a foreign government. In fact, the
purpose of the new provision is to allow unlimited surveillance of any American
without the hassle of having to prove even the "remotest" connection to
organized terror or a foreign government. It is a "blank check" for law
enforcement to eschew all privacy laws without fear of reprimand. It is the end
of the 4th amendment.
More importantly, if someone is arrested (as was the case with 1200 Muslims
after 9-11) as a terrorist suspect, he can be refused bail and IMPRISONED
INDEFINITLY WITHOUT CHARGES. The moniker of "terrorist" trumps the underlying
principle of American jurisprudence, that is, the "presumption of innocence"
Now, prisoners will have to prove that they aren't guilty; a difficult prospect
when there is no process in place to challenge the terms of their detention.
Consider the comments of Judge Antonin Scalia in this regard: "The very core of
liberty secured by our Anglo-Saxon system of separated powers has been freedom
from indefinite imprisonment at the will of the Executive."
This sounds like empty rhetoric coming from Scalia, but his point is a valid
one. Where arbitrary imprisonment begins, the rule of law ends. American
citizens are no longer protected by "inalienable rights"; their safety depends
on the discretion of the President.
This brief summary doesn't cover all the repressive elements of the new bill.
It does, however, show how personal liberty is being sacrificed to enhance the
power of the state. The Intelligence Reform legislation is 615 pages long. Not
one was written by either a Senator or a Congressman. This entire campaign to
strip Americans of their civil liberties is being orchestrated by private
interests; the "silent partners" who wrote this legislation in its entirety.
Think about that.
The document that will be signed into law next week is a frontal assault on the
fundamental rights of man. Even Habeas Corpus, which goes back 600 years in
English law, is struck down.
The enemies of freedom are among us, and they're moving quickly. But, don't
take my word for it. Consider the meaning of these attacks on basic rights and
make your own judgment.
Copyright: Progressive Trail
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7518.htm
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/7gSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
