Click on the url if you can not download from article:

http://cubajournal.blogspot.com/2011/02/ebook-bajos-las-alas-del-condor.html
eBook "Bajos Las Alas Del Condor" available for free
download<http://cubajournal.blogspot.com/2011/02/ebook-bajos-las-alas-del-condor.html>

<http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-OSoF9K7AUsU/TV576OSX-8I/AAAAAAAAIlk/vvU0CyL_VWI/s1600/Bajo%2BLas%2BAlas%2BDel%2BCondor.png>
*Click here to 
download*<http://cubadebate.cu/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bajo-las-alas-del-condor.pdf>
This eBook is courtesy of the International Book Fair which is taking place
this week in Havana, Cuba.
 Posted by Cuba Journal at 2/18/2011 08:58:00
AM<http://cubajournal.blogspot.com/2011/02/ebook-bajos-las-alas-del-condor.html>



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Trial of Luis Posada Carriles
 El Paso Diary (XX): Judge Cardone
  <http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=7&lg_pp=en>   José
Pertierra <http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=7&lg_pp=en>

 Translated by *
Machetera<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=10&lg_pp=en>
-  Manuel
Talens <http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=1&lg_pp=en> *



Judge Kathleen Cardone continued the case of Luis Posada Carriles in El Paso
until next Tuesday, February 22, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.  The defense attorney,
Arturo Hernández, moved last week to dismiss counts one through three of the
indictment: those having to do with his client’s false statements about the
bombs that exploded in Havana in 1997.  This morning, the judge was supposed
to have announced her decision regarding that motion, but she surprised
everyone by deciding to delay the case another seven days to “deliberate
calmly.”


  Judge Kathleen Cardone
*Good morning*

Both the defense and the prosecution met yesterday behind closed doors with
Judge Cardone.  This is a judge who enjoys many such meetings, even some ex
parte, meaning that she meets first alone with the defense and later with
the prosecutors (or vice versa).  Although it is permitted, this is rare
during criminal litigation.

Today’s hearing lasted less than ten minutes.  The judge entered the
courtroom with a worried expression on her face.  After a dry “good
morning,” she asked the attorneys, “Are you ready for the jury?”  No one
said no.  It would have been logical for at least one of the attorneys to
ask about the pending motion for dismissal, yet none did.  They remained at
ease at counsel table—like characters in a chronicle of a case foretold.

The members of the jury filed in and walked slowly toward their seats.  When
they were all situated, Judge Cardone told them, “Oftentimes there are
complicated matters that require a lot of thought, and I still have some
legal matters to resolve.”  She apologized for the delay and told them, “I
want you to know that I don’t take these steps lightly.”  She then continued
the case until Tuesday, February 22nd.  The judge reminded the jurors that
they could not read or listen to news about the case nor conduct research
about it on the Internet.  Her smile appeared strained as she dismissed the
jury until next week.

The jurors filed out of the courtroom with no clue about the legal
controversy that had precipitated yet another delay in the case.  Judge
Cardone rose, and without looking at the faces of the attorneys still in the
courtroom or saying a word, opened the door to her chambers and made her
exit.

*The FBI cables*

Things came to a head after Luis Posada Carriles’ attorney lodged
objections.  Arturo Hernández asserted that the prosecution had not shared
two declassified FBI cables that would have exculpated Posada Carriles.  The
first, dated September 24, 1997, reported that an FBI informant had said
that Fidel Castro was responsible for the bombs exploded in Havana.  From
this FBI “source,” Attorney Hernández deduced that “the bombing campaigns
were the opportunistic brainchild of Fidel Castro, then absolute dictator of
Cuba, and his intelligence services, for the purpose of deflecting attention
away from the upcoming visit of Pope John Paul II.”

The U.S. government attorneys, alleged defense counsel, had failed to turn
over this FBI report to him until only a few weeks ago, which resulted in
him not having had time to subpoena the author of the document or identify
the source that provided the information so that both might be brought to El
Paso to testify.

The prosecutors responded to these arguments yesterday.  In a pleading filed
with the court, they discounted the credibility of the source that provided
that information to the FBI, because “the United States has conferred with
the FBI Agent who wrote the September 25, 1997 document, who stated that the
document was based on the statements of an uninformed source who was biased
against Cuba.”

The prosecution added, “the FBI eventually conducted a more thorough
investigation of the Havana bombings, which did not reach the conclusion
that the Cuban government was in any way involved in planning the bombings.”


Posada Carriles’ lawyer also complained in his motion that the government
had failed to disclose to the defense a second FBI report that contains
“extremely important exculpatory material.”  Arturo Hernández summarized the
document dated November 18, 2004 as having stated that the “Castro regime
had undertaken a plan to assassinate the Defendant in the year 2004.”

This, Hernández, “is evidence of extreme bias against the accused by the
Castro regime.”   In its response yesterday, the prosecution discounted this
FBI report as simple conjecture from an unreliable source, and further cited
as an example a third FBI report dated May 11, 1999 that says that the
government of Guatemala—not Cuba —had organized the attempt made on Posada
Carriles’ life in the 1980s.

The prosecution characterized all three FBI reports as “unreliable,
unfounded conjecture.”  Consequently, wrote the prosecution in its response
to Posada Carriles’ attorney, the reports are not relevant to the case.

Posada Carriles’ complaints about the Cuban inspector

Another of the complaints from Posada’s defense attorney is that the Cuban
inspector who testified last Wednesday, Roberto Hernández Caballero, is
allegedly a Cuban counterintelligence agent.  We don’t know if this is true,
because the judge abruptly interrupted the prosecutor’s direct examination
of the inspector and the question had not been posed to him yet.

But in their answer to attorney Hernández’s motion to dismiss, the
prosecutors did challenge the defense’s underlying major premise.  “The
defendant’s entire premise is based on his argument that the fields of
criminal investigation and counterintelligence are somehow contradictory.”
The prosecutors pointed out, “In fact, in the United States, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation is responsible for investigating counterintelligence
matters and has a Counterintelligence Division within its National Security
Branch.  It is certainly possible that a foreign government could also
assign counterintelligence duties to its FBI agents.”

*Trial or travesty?*

Judge Cardone said that next week she will rule on the defense motion and
decide whether to dismiss the counts related to the defendant’s role in the
bombs that exploded in Havana in 1997.  If she throws out those charges,
none of the three Cuban witnesses will testify, and the trial against Posada
will be reduced to whether the defendant lied about his manner of entry into
the country: whether he came by boat or by pickup truck—a true travesty.

*Cardone*

The case is now in the hands of Judge Kathleen Cardone.  She was born in New
York in 1953 and moved to Texas to attend law school at St. Mary’s
University in San Antonio.  She graduated from St. Mary’s in 1979.

In Texas judges are elected to their positions unless a vacancy occurs, at
which time the governor appoints the judge.  In 1995, a vacancy in Texas’
Judicial District 383 arose, and the governor at the time—George W.
Bush—named Kathleen Cardone to the post.  Her tenure was short, however,
because she had to submit to an election the next year and lost.  Judge
Cardone went back to work as an attorney and began teaching at a local
community college.  She also became an aerobics instructor.

Governor Bush, however, had not forgotten her.  In 1999, state officials
created Texas Judicial District 388, a new judicial district, and Governor
Bush quickly named Cardone to fill the slot.  Judge Cardone’s joy was again
short-lived, however.  The next year, she had to stand for election to
retain her seat on the bench and the voters defeated her once more.

Perhaps out of gratitude to George W. Bush for having placed so much faith
in her, in 2000 Kathleen Cardone made a $500 contribution to Bush’s
presidential 
campaign<http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/2580756.html>.
Her candidate of choice was declared the winner of that controversial
election and became the next president.  On May 1, 2003, President George W.
Bush named Cardone the federal judge in El Paso: the third time he had given
her a judicial position.  Since federal judgeships are lifetime
appointments, Judge Cardone need never again worry about losing another
election.

In a 2004 article about Texas judges who lost state elections but later
received a lifetime appointment to the federal bench—Judge Cardone mentioned
among them—University of Houston professor Robert Carp is quoted as saying,
“Judgeships often go to people who have served the party in some
way.<http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/2580756.html>
It’s not an uncommon phenomenon or situation for someone who moves to the
federal bench to have some political ties.” (Joe Black, “Judge who lost
election in line for a lifetime job,” Houston Chronicle, Washington Bureau,
May 20, 2004, 12:17 a.m.)

Barely four years after President George W. Bush named Cardone a federal
judge, the case of Luis Posada Carriles fell on her doorstep.  And on May 8,
2007 (less than five months after the case had begun), Judge Cardone
dismissed it.  She ruled that the government had deceived and entrapped
Posada Carriles—and that it had done so to get him to make false
declarations so that the government could later indict him for perjury.
Judge Cardone was scathing in her
criticism<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/upload/telechargements/61.pdf>,
“The Government’s tactics in this case are so grossly shocking and so
outrageous as to violate the universal sense of justice.  As a result, this
Court is left with no choice but to dismiss the indictment.”

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, whose jurisdiction includes the federal
court in El Paso, reviewed the record on appeal.  The Court remanded the
case for trial, ruling that Judge Cardone had committed reversible error by
dismissing the case.  “...There simply is no basis for the district court’s
conclusion,” wrote the appeals court in its 35-page decision issued on
August 14, 2008.

*Two questions*

Once again the case is at a critical juncture.  Judge Cardone has already
dismissed the indictment once.  Is she inclined to do so again?

If she throws out the indictment—or any of the counts therein—Judge Cardone
would have to be certain that the Court of Appeals would not find grounds
for reversing her decision again and level still more criticism against her
reasoning.  She would need to find solid legal ground for a decision to
dismiss.  Could this be the reason she needs more time to deliberate?

*Read El Paso Diary (I): Jury Selected
<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3421>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (II): Reardon, "Art" and the Promises to the
Jury<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3423>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (III): Today we heard a voice from the
past<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3427>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (IV): The Lead Prosecutor in the Cuban Five Case Refused
a DHS Request to Press Criminal Charges Against Posada
Carriles<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3438>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (V): Art's
Theater<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3476>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (VI): First, the
Lies<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3479>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (VII): The Tip of the
Iceberg<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3490>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (VIII): The Witness in the Grey
Suit<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3492>
*
* *
*Read El Paso Diary (IX): Abascal's testimony damages Posada's
defense<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3499>
*
* *
*Read **El Paso Diary (X): The Fear, the Courage and the
Bomb*<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3524>
* *
*Read El Paso Diary (XI): Judge Cardone at the center of the
drama<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3528>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XII): Questions are not evidence, but they
sway<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3558>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XIII): The soap opera matters more than the
truth<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3691>
*

*Read **El Paso Diary (XIV): Posada Carriles Sleeps Like a
Baby*<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3724&enligne=aff>

*Read **El Paso Diary (XV): The Battle for the
Passport*<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3814&enligne=aff>

*Read El Paso Diary (XVI): The Gathering
Storm<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3812&enligne=aff>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XVII): The War Against the Cuban
Evidence<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3815&enligne=aff>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XVIII): The Cuban
Inspector<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3819&enligne=aff>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XIX):
Quicksand<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3817&enligne=aff>
*


------------------------------

Courtesy of Counterpunch<http://www.counterpunch.org/pertierra02182011.html>
Source:
http://www.cubadebate.cu/noticias/2011/02/15/diario-de-el-paso-la-jueza-cardone/
Publication date of original article: 15/02/2011
URL of this page: http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3878


  The Trial of Luis Posada Carriles  El Paso Diary (XX): Judge Cardone
  <http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=7&lg_pp=en>   José
Pertierra <http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=7&lg_pp=en>

 Translated by *
Machetera<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=10&lg_pp=en>
-  Manuel
Talens <http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/biographie.asp?ref_aut=1&lg_pp=en> *



Judge Kathleen Cardone continued the case of Luis Posada Carriles in El Paso
until next Tuesday, February 22, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.  The defense attorney,
Arturo Hernández, moved last week to dismiss counts one through three of the
indictment: those having to do with his client’s false statements about the
bombs that exploded in Havana in 1997.  This morning, the judge was supposed
to have announced her decision regarding that motion, but she surprised
everyone by deciding to delay the case another seven days to “deliberate
calmly.”


  Judge Kathleen Cardone
*Good morning*

Both the defense and the prosecution met yesterday behind closed doors with
Judge Cardone.  This is a judge who enjoys many such meetings, even some ex
parte, meaning that she meets first alone with the defense and later with
the prosecutors (or vice versa).  Although it is permitted, this is rare
during criminal litigation.

Today’s hearing lasted less than ten minutes.  The judge entered the
courtroom with a worried expression on her face.  After a dry “good
morning,” she asked the attorneys, “Are you ready for the jury?”  No one
said no.  It would have been logical for at least one of the attorneys to
ask about the pending motion for dismissal, yet none did.  They remained at
ease at counsel table—like characters in a chronicle of a case foretold.

The members of the jury filed in and walked slowly toward their seats.  When
they were all situated, Judge Cardone told them, “Oftentimes there are
complicated matters that require a lot of thought, and I still have some
legal matters to resolve.”  She apologized for the delay and told them, “I
want you to know that I don’t take these steps lightly.”  She then continued
the case until Tuesday, February 22nd.  The judge reminded the jurors that
they could not read or listen to news about the case nor conduct research
about it on the Internet.  Her smile appeared strained as she dismissed the
jury until next week.

The jurors filed out of the courtroom with no clue about the legal
controversy that had precipitated yet another delay in the case.  Judge
Cardone rose, and without looking at the faces of the attorneys still in the
courtroom or saying a word, opened the door to her chambers and made her
exit.

*The FBI cables*

Things came to a head after Luis Posada Carriles’ attorney lodged
objections.  Arturo Hernández asserted that the prosecution had not shared
two declassified FBI cables that would have exculpated Posada Carriles.  The
first, dated September 24, 1997, reported that an FBI informant had said
that Fidel Castro was responsible for the bombs exploded in Havana.  From
this FBI “source,” Attorney Hernández deduced that “the bombing campaigns
were the opportunistic brainchild of Fidel Castro, then absolute dictator of
Cuba, and his intelligence services, for the purpose of deflecting attention
away from the upcoming visit of Pope John Paul II.”

The U.S. government attorneys, alleged defense counsel, had failed to turn
over this FBI report to him until only a few weeks ago, which resulted in
him not having had time to subpoena the author of the document or identify
the source that provided the information so that both might be brought to El
Paso to testify.

The prosecutors responded to these arguments yesterday.  In a pleading filed
with the court, they discounted the credibility of the source that provided
that information to the FBI, because “the United States has conferred with
the FBI Agent who wrote the September 25, 1997 document, who stated that the
document was based on the statements of an uninformed source who was biased
against Cuba.”

The prosecution added, “the FBI eventually conducted a more thorough
investigation of the Havana bombings, which did not reach the conclusion
that the Cuban government was in any way involved in planning the bombings.”


Posada Carriles’ lawyer also complained in his motion that the government
had failed to disclose to the defense a second FBI report that contains
“extremely important exculpatory material.”  Arturo Hernández summarized the
document dated November 18, 2004 as having stated that the “Castro regime
had undertaken a plan to assassinate the Defendant in the year 2004.”

This, Hernández, “is evidence of extreme bias against the accused by the
Castro regime.”   In its response yesterday, the prosecution discounted this
FBI report as simple conjecture from an unreliable source, and further cited
as an example a third FBI report dated May 11, 1999 that says that the
government of Guatemala—not Cuba —had organized the attempt made on Posada
Carriles’ life in the 1980s.

The prosecution characterized all three FBI reports as “unreliable,
unfounded conjecture.”  Consequently, wrote the prosecution in its response
to Posada Carriles’ attorney, the reports are not relevant to the case.

Posada Carriles’ complaints about the Cuban inspector

Another of the complaints from Posada’s defense attorney is that the Cuban
inspector who testified last Wednesday, Roberto Hernández Caballero, is
allegedly a Cuban counterintelligence agent.  We don’t know if this is true,
because the judge abruptly interrupted the prosecutor’s direct examination
of the inspector and the question had not been posed to him yet.

But in their answer to attorney Hernández’s motion to dismiss, the
prosecutors did challenge the defense’s underlying major premise.  “The
defendant’s entire premise is based on his argument that the fields of
criminal investigation and counterintelligence are somehow contradictory.”
The prosecutors pointed out, “In fact, in the United States, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation is responsible for investigating counterintelligence
matters and has a Counterintelligence Division within its National Security
Branch.  It is certainly possible that a foreign government could also
assign counterintelligence duties to its FBI agents.”

*Trial or travesty?*

Judge Cardone said that next week she will rule on the defense motion and
decide whether to dismiss the counts related to the defendant’s role in the
bombs that exploded in Havana in 1997.  If she throws out those charges,
none of the three Cuban witnesses will testify, and the trial against Posada
will be reduced to whether the defendant lied about his manner of entry into
the country: whether he came by boat or by pickup truck—a true travesty.

*Cardone*

The case is now in the hands of Judge Kathleen Cardone.  She was born in New
York in 1953 and moved to Texas to attend law school at St. Mary’s
University in San Antonio.  She graduated from St. Mary’s in 1979.

In Texas judges are elected to their positions unless a vacancy occurs, at
which time the governor appoints the judge.  In 1995, a vacancy in Texas’
Judicial District 383 arose, and the governor at the time—George W.
Bush—named Kathleen Cardone to the post.  Her tenure was short, however,
because she had to submit to an election the next year and lost.  Judge
Cardone went back to work as an attorney and began teaching at a local
community college.  She also became an aerobics instructor.

Governor Bush, however, had not forgotten her.  In 1999, state officials
created Texas Judicial District 388, a new judicial district, and Governor
Bush quickly named Cardone to fill the slot.  Judge Cardone’s joy was again
short-lived, however.  The next year, she had to stand for election to
retain her seat on the bench and the voters defeated her once more.

Perhaps out of gratitude to George W. Bush for having placed so much faith
in her, in 2000 Kathleen Cardone made a $500 contribution to Bush’s
presidential 
campaign<http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/2580756.html>.
Her candidate of choice was declared the winner of that controversial
election and became the next president.  On May 1, 2003, President George W.
Bush named Cardone the federal judge in El Paso: the third time he had given
her a judicial position.  Since federal judgeships are lifetime
appointments, Judge Cardone need never again worry about losing another
election.

In a 2004 article about Texas judges who lost state elections but later
received a lifetime appointment to the federal bench—Judge Cardone mentioned
among them—University of Houston professor Robert Carp is quoted as saying,
“Judgeships often go to people who have served the party in some
way.<http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/2580756.html>
It’s not an uncommon phenomenon or situation for someone who moves to the
federal bench to have some political ties.” (Joe Black, “Judge who lost
election in line for a lifetime job,” Houston Chronicle, Washington Bureau,
May 20, 2004, 12:17 a.m.)

Barely four years after President George W. Bush named Cardone a federal
judge, the case of Luis Posada Carriles fell on her doorstep.  And on May 8,
2007 (less than five months after the case had begun), Judge Cardone
dismissed it.  She ruled that the government had deceived and entrapped
Posada Carriles—and that it had done so to get him to make false
declarations so that the government could later indict him for perjury.
Judge Cardone was scathing in her
criticism<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/upload/telechargements/61.pdf>,
“The Government’s tactics in this case are so grossly shocking and so
outrageous as to violate the universal sense of justice.  As a result, this
Court is left with no choice but to dismiss the indictment.”

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, whose jurisdiction includes the federal
court in El Paso, reviewed the record on appeal.  The Court remanded the
case for trial, ruling that Judge Cardone had committed reversible error by
dismissing the case.  “...There simply is no basis for the district court’s
conclusion,” wrote the appeals court in its 35-page decision issued on
August 14, 2008.

*Two questions*

Once again the case is at a critical juncture.  Judge Cardone has already
dismissed the indictment once.  Is she inclined to do so again?

If she throws out the indictment—or any of the counts therein—Judge Cardone
would have to be certain that the Court of Appeals would not find grounds
for reversing her decision again and level still more criticism against her
reasoning.  She would need to find solid legal ground for a decision to
dismiss.  Could this be the reason she needs more time to deliberate?

*Read El Paso Diary (I): Jury Selected
<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3421>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (II): Reardon, "Art" and the Promises to the
Jury<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3423>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (III): Today we heard a voice from the
past<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3427>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (IV): The Lead Prosecutor in the Cuban Five Case Refused
a DHS Request to Press Criminal Charges Against Posada
Carriles<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3438>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (V): Art's
Theater<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3476>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (VI): First, the
Lies<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3479>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (VII): The Tip of the
Iceberg<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3490>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (VIII): The Witness in the Grey
Suit<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3492>
*
* *
*Read El Paso Diary (IX): Abascal's testimony damages Posada's
defense<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3499>
*
* *
*Read **El Paso Diary (X): The Fear, the Courage and the
Bomb*<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3524>
* *
*Read El Paso Diary (XI): Judge Cardone at the center of the
drama<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3528>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XII): Questions are not evidence, but they
sway<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3558>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XIII): The soap opera matters more than the
truth<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3691>
*

*Read **El Paso Diary (XIV): Posada Carriles Sleeps Like a
Baby*<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3724&enligne=aff>

*Read **El Paso Diary (XV): The Battle for the
Passport*<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3814&enligne=aff>

*Read El Paso Diary (XVI): The Gathering
Storm<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3812&enligne=aff>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XVII): The War Against the Cuban
Evidence<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3815&enligne=aff>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XVIII): The Cuban
Inspector<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3819&enligne=aff>
*

*Read El Paso Diary (XIX):
Quicksand<http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3817&enligne=aff>
*


------------------------------

Courtesy of Counterpunch<http://www.counterpunch.org/pertierra02182011.html>
Source:
http://www.cubadebate.cu/noticias/2011/02/15/diario-de-el-paso-la-jueza-cardone/
Publication date of original article: 15/02/2011
URL of this page: http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=3878


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to