Re: [Pinpoint]: LGPL + new non-ASF committer question

2008-02-26 Thread Luciano Resende
That should be ok, AFAIK. On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > Are they already ASF committers ? From looking at Apache Labs bylaws > > [1], the Labs PMC will not ask for commit access for people that are > > not already ASF committers. > > > >

Re: [Pinpoint]: LGPL + new non-ASF committer question

2008-02-26 Thread Paul Smith
Are they already ASF committers ? From looking at Apache Labs bylaws [1], the Labs PMC will not ask for commit access for people that are not already ASF committers. [1] http://labs.apache.org/bylaws.html Oooh, fair point. What about accepting patches provided on behalf of someone else?

Re: [Pinpoint]: LGPL + new non-ASF committer question

2008-02-26 Thread Luciano Resende
Responding to your first question, as others are handling the license one. On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll start with hopefully the easier of the two questions first. I > make no secret that I suck at Web-based UI's. I do however have > friends who

Re: [Pinpoint]: LGPL + new non-ASF committer question

2008-02-26 Thread Paul Smith
http://extjs.com/license And it has a list of very dubious restrictions on the application of LGPL 3.0 that are actually not compliant with LGPL. Do you mean the "you may use our open source license terms if..." statement? (IANAL) Paul

Re: [Pinpoint]: LGPL + new non-ASF committer question

2008-02-26 Thread Matthieu Riou
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > which I must say is _schmick_ stuff, and he's already mocked up an > > awesome UI for Pinpoint that I'm drooling over using it. ExtJs > > is tad.. LPGL, so initially I groaned with licensing pain. > > > Specifi

Re: [Pinpoint]: LGPL + new non-ASF committer question

2008-02-26 Thread Paul Smith
which I must say is _schmick_ stuff, and he's already mocked up an awesome UI for Pinpoint that I'm drooling over using it. ExtJs is tad.. LPGL, so initially I groaned with licensing pain. Specifically it is Open Source LGPL 3.0 license http://extjs.com/license cheers, Paul

[Pinpoint]: LGPL + new non-ASF committer question

2008-02-26 Thread Paul Smith
I'll start with hopefully the easier of the two questions first. I make no secret that I suck at Web-based UI's. I do however have friends who are excellent at it, but they are non-Apache committers and do not obviously have write access to the repository, but I _would_ like them to. Wha

[jira] Commented: (LABS-116) Initial handshake stalls in TLS negotiation with Psi client

2008-02-26 Thread Bernd Fondermann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LABS-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572442#action_12572442 ] Bernd Fondermann commented on LABS-116: --- Santiago, many thanks for the comment. We will