Re: Releases

On 10 Mar 2017, at 5:21 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > At the moment it looks for me as you are against any change. But you don't > tell us any reason for it, You just say no. Is this Apache Way? Not really, > right? That’s too general a statement to respond to. > No one ask to do a full releas

Re: Hi!

> labs is a place where a > community already exists, to develop new code, but what is missing is not > the basic infrastructure, but the Apache processes. To me, that sounds a lot like a description of the Incubator. Maybe Labs should provide a place to help establish a community, assuming one

Re: Hi!

Hi John, Yes, I think those are areas we need to address. I particularly like the idea that you have just sparked in me, that labs is a place where a community already exists, to develop new code, but what is missing is not the basic infrastructure, but the Apache processes. It should be a sandbox

Re: Releases

> On Mar 10, 2017, at 10:21, Raphael Bircher wrote: > > Hi Graham > > Am .03.2017, 15:34 Uhr, schrieb Graham Leggett >: > >> On 10 Mar 2017, at 3:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I think the purpose of Labs should be this: “Labs is the place where y

Re: Releases

Hi Graham Am .03.2017, 15:34 Uhr, schrieb Graham Leggett : On 10 Mar 2017, at 3:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: I think the purpose of Labs should be this: “Labs is the place where you develop software with the goal of introducing that software to the Apache Incubator”. So you *really* beli

Apache labs

Hello, My name is Scott Aslan and I am a committer on the Apache Nifi project and I am interested in helping put Apache Labs on the map! -- *Scott Aslan = new WebDeveloper(* *{"location": {"city": "Saint Cloud","state": "FL", "zip": "34771"},"contact": {"e

Re: Releases

On 10 Mar 2017, at 3:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I think the purpose of Labs should be this: >> >> “Labs is the place where you develop software with the goal of introducing >> that software to the Apache Incubator”. > So you *really* believe that an labs being a incubator-incubator or >

Re: Releases

On 10 Mar 2017, at 3:49 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >> I think the purpose of Labs should be this: >> >> “Labs is the place where you develop software with the goal of introducing >> that software to the Apache Incubator”. >> >> The point at which you enter the Apache Incubator is the point at

Re: Hi!

I am asking if anyone has have done it successfully. On March 10, 2017 at 08:33:54, Graham Leggett (minf...@sharp.fm) wrote: On 10 Mar 2017, at 3:29 PM, Otto Fowler wrote: Is there an example of a successful Labs project that DID make it to incubator? How was that set up? What was the feedbac

Re: Releases

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > I think the purpose of Labs should be this: > > “Labs is the place where you develop software with the goal of introducing > that software to the Apache Incubator”. > > The point at which you enter the Apache Incubator is the point at whi

Re: Releases

On 03/10/2017 06:45 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 08 Mar 2017, at 7:15 PM, jan iversen wrote: If you compare with GitHub, I can make a release every day if I want (and call it a release), so why limit myself ? You can release every day at Github sure, but you can’t call those releases Apac

Re: Hi!

Hi, Is there an example of a successful Labs project that DID make it to incubator? How was that set up? What was the feedback from that project? Information on what worked before and what didn’t would be helpful. On March 10, 2017 at 08:23:25, Graham Leggett (minf...@sharp.fm) wrote: On 07

Re: Hi!

On 10 Mar 2017, at 3:29 PM, Otto Fowler wrote: > Is there an example of a successful Labs project that DID make it to > incubator? > How was that set up? What was the feedback from that project? > > Information on what worked before and what didn’t would be helpful. I suspect you’re overthink

Re: Hi!

Agreed. I've been doing all of my open-source development on GitHub recently, but I was heavily involved with Apache Pivot from 2009 - 2011 or so. I've found that GitHub is great for hosting but terrible for community. It's something I really miss about the ASF. Not sure if Labs is the right veh

Re: Hi!

On 07 Mar 2017, at 9:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Saw Danny's note and figured I'd drop a note over here. > > I'm interested in labs, however there's some limitations that concern me. > > 1. Labs projects can't do releases. > 2. Labs projects all write to a single SVN tree structure - no git.

Re: Hi!

+1 on this for me as well. I think these limitations will result in limited appeal unfortunately On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, 13:05 John D. Ament, wrote: > Ping? :-) > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:11 PM John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Hi there > > > > Saw Danny's note and figured I'd drop a note over here.

Re: Hi!

Ping? :-) On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:11 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Hi there > > Saw Danny's note and figured I'd drop a note over here. > > I'm interested in labs, however there's some limitations that concern me. > > 1. Labs projects can't do releases. > 2. Labs projects all write to a single SVN

Re: Releases

Am .03.2017, 13:22 Uhr, schrieb Greg Brown : I think the purpose of Labs should be this: “Labs is the place where you develop software with the goal of introducing that software to the Apache Incubator”. The point at which you enter the Apache Incubator is the point at which you want to m

Re: Releases

+1 On Mar 10, 2017 5:15 PM, "Graham Leggett" wrote: > On 08 Mar 2017, at 7:15 PM, jan iversen wrote: > > > If you compare with GitHub, I can make a release every day if I want > (and call it a release), so why limit myself ? > > You can release every day at Github sure, but you can’t call those

Re: Releases

> I think the purpose of Labs should be this: > > “Labs is the place where you develop software with the goal of introducing > that software to the Apache Incubator”. > > The point at which you enter the Apache Incubator is the point at which you > want to make your first release. +1 ---

Re: Releases

+1 On 10 March 2017 at 11:45, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 08 Mar 2017, at 7:15 PM, jan iversen wrote: > >> If you compare with GitHub, I can make a release every day if I want (and >> call it a release), so why limit myself ? > > You can release every day at Github sure, but you can’t call those

Re: Releases

I think yes, but limited to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots, only. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Danny Angus wrote: > > > So my question to those people is this; Is it the lack of the formality > and > > as

Re: Releases

On 08 Mar 2017, at 7:15 PM, jan iversen wrote: > If you compare with GitHub, I can make a release every day if I want (and > call it a release), so why limit myself ? You can release every day at Github sure, but you can’t call those releases Apache releases. To be released by the Apache Softw

Re: Releases

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Danny Angus wrote: > So my question to those people is this; Is it the lack of the formality and > assurance that is a problem or the lack of a build? Would "pre-release > downloads" be enough? Would have been enough for me. OTOH: With such "pre-releases", the fir