Thank you Ant. I appreciate it :)
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, ant elder wrote:
> A belated +1 of encouragement from me, sounds like a great project to do.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Florian MOGA wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to start a lab related to the websocket a
A belated +1 of encouragement from me, sounds like a great project to do.
...ant
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Florian MOGA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a lab related to the websocket api and the websocket
> protocol. It will initially contain an implementation of a Java websocket
>
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Florian MOGA wrote:
> Is it possible for someone with the appropriate permissions to perform a
> sync between svn and the website in order to reflect the latest updates?
Done, should be available after the next sync.
Niall
> Thank you,
> Florian
>
> On Mon, Nov
Is it possible for someone with the appropriate permissions to perform a
sync between svn and the website in order to reflect the latest updates?
Thank you,
Florian
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Florian MOGA wrote:
> The Monsoon lab has been created. Feel free to give suggestions, comments,
>
The Monsoon lab has been created. Feel free to give suggestions, comments,
feedback or to post questions regarding this lab.
Thanks,
Florian
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Florian MOGA wrote:
> After > 72 hours, there are 5 +1 votes (Tim, Bernd, Niall, Pid and
> Kevin) and no -1 votes. As per
After > 72 hours, there are 5 +1 votes (Tim, Bernd, Niall, Pid and
Kevin) and no -1 votes. As per Apache Labs Bylaws, I will proceed with the
lab creation.
Thank you all for the positive reaction to my request.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 4:3
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 29/10/2010 07:15, Florian MOGA wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to start a lab related to the websocket api and the websocket
>> protocol. It will initially contain an implementation of a Java websocket
>> client. The aim is to provide multiple versions
On 29/10/2010 07:15, Florian MOGA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a lab related to the websocket api and the websocket
> protocol. It will initially contain an implementation of a Java websocket
> client. The aim is to provide multiple versions according to each of the
> latest IETF drafts offe
+1
Niall
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Florian MOGA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a lab related to the websocket api and the websocket
> protocol. It will initially contain an implementation of a Java websocket
> client. The aim is to provide multiple versions according to each of the
>
+1
Bernd
On 2010-10-29, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Florian MOGA wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to start a lab related to the websocket api and the websocket
>> protocol.
>
> +1
>
> --tim
>
> -
> To un
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Florian MOGA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a lab related to the websocket api and the websocket
> protocol.
+1
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org
For additiona
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> As discussed earlier, I'd like to start a new lab for pursuing a
> resource store idea that's based on discussions with various people
> over the past few months.
Thanks for the positive feedback! I'll get started with this lab as
soon
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> ...As discussed earlier, I'd like to start a new lab for pursuing a
> resource store idea that's based on discussions with various people
> over the past few months...
Enthusiastic +1!
-Bertrand
-
I had a draft answer, I edited after some hours and I sent both my
mistake. It is not a biggie, and there are no big differences between
the twn, but obviously my intentions are best reflected by the second
one.
Sorry for the mistake
Santiago
-
El vie, 18-06-2010 a las 15:01 +0200, Jukka Zitting escribió:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed earlier, I'd like to start a new lab for pursuing a
> resource store idea that's based on discussions with various people
> over the past few months. As a mix between a NoSQL database, a content
> repository and a
El vie, 18-06-2010 a las 15:01 +0200, Jukka Zitting escribió:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed earlier, I'd like to start a new lab for pursuing a
> resource store idea that's based on discussions with various people
> over the past few months. As a mix between a NoSQL database, a content
> repository and a
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed earlier, I'd like to start a new lab for pursuing a
> resource store idea that's based on discussions with various people
> over the past few months. As a mix between a NoSQL database, a content
> repository and a web fra
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> As discussed earlier, I'd like to start a new lab for pursuing a
> resource store idea that's based on discussions with various people
> over the past few months. As a mix between a NoSQL database, a content
> repository and a web framework, Oak takes ideas from projects like
Great!
Simone
2010/4/29 Mladen Turk
> AFAICT, I collected 3 binding +1 from
> Bernd, Simone and Bertrand.
> There was no objections, so according to lab rules
> I'll create svn repo axmake by the end of this week.
>
>
>
> On 04/15/2010 12:48 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at
AFAICT, I collected 3 binding +1 from
Bernd, Simone and Bertrand.
There was no objections, so according to lab rules
I'll create svn repo axmake by the end of this week.
On 04/15/2010 12:48 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi Mladen, the lab request
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> So far I collected two +1
> (dunno however if the folks who voted are at the lab PMC or not).
>
> Seeking for a third vote (or more)
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> So far I collected two +1
> (dunno however if the folks who voted are at the lab PMC or not).
Looks like Simone and Bernd are on the PMC though, so you do have 2
binding votes thus far.
> Seeking for a third vote (or more)
+1 (non-binding th
So far I collected two +1
(dunno however if the folks who voted are at the lab PMC or not).
Seeking for a third vote (or more)
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 04/18/2010 09:51 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi,
Beside attempts like premake and scons, there is no actually
good multiplatform native build toolkits. Existing ant plugins
either follow the premake/scons concept of producing the native
make files, or do a compilation directly, but all of them
Hi,
> Beside attempts like premake and scons, there is no actually
> good multiplatform native build toolkits. Existing ant plugins
> either follow the premake/scons concept of producing the native
> make files, or do a compilation directly, but all of them require
> some sort of (usually huge) ru
On 04/16/2010 08:23 PM, Simone Gianni wrote:
+1
I don't do a lot of C developement, but being a Linux user have to compile C
things from time to time, and I find make "a bit outdated" :) Are you
planning to "port ant" or start from scratch with an ant like syntax?
From scratch, although I alr
+1
Bernd
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 20:23, Simone Gianni wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't do a lot of C developement, but being a Linux user have to compile C
> things from time to time, and I find make "a bit outdated" :) Are you
> planning to "port ant" or start from scratch with an ant like syntax?
>
>
+1
I don't do a lot of C developement, but being a Linux user have to compile C
things from time to time, and I find make "a bit outdated" :) Are you
planning to "port ant" or start from scratch with an ant like syntax?
Simone
2010/4/15 Mladen Turk
> On 04/15/2010 12:48 PM, Tim Williams wrot
On 04/15/2010 12:48 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a lab project for a thing currently called axmake.
Dunno if description is needed at this stage, but it's my attempt
to create a lightweight ant-like replacement written in
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to ask for a lab project for a thing currently called axmake.
> Dunno if description is needed at this stage, but it's my attempt
> to create a lightweight ant-like replacement written in C for
> using instead standard GNU au
Hi Alexei,
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Hello folks,
Recently I became involved in development of H.323-compatible software
videophone [1] based on MPL-licensed OpenH323. It is mostly the same
as Ekiga [2], though we hardly can join GPL-ed project due to complex licensing
of the existing code. I have
Hello all,
thanks for casting your votes.
The Magma lab received 7 positive vote, 1 non binding positive vote, and
no negative votes.
72 hours are passed, so I suppose I can go on and create the Lab.
I'm working quite hard today and tomorrow, so I think I'll start
creating the svn space and movi
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Simone Gianni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...So, I'm asking for a lab named Magma
>
> +1, sounds exciting!
+1
> -- Bertrand (hoping that the name is a reference to
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(band) ;-)
>
>
+1
Simone Gianni wrote:
> Dear researchers,
>
> lately I've been playing around with AOP and related technologies to
> overcome the common code reuse and extension limitations in Java. While
> AOP is a good answer to many common system integration problems, and is
> therefore an already well esta
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Simone Gianni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So, I'm asking for a lab named Magma
+1, sounds exciting!
-- Bertrand (hoping that the name is a reference to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(band) ;-)
-
Simone Gianni wrote:
Dear researchers,
lately I've been playing around with AOP and related technologies to
overcome the common code reuse and extension limitations in Java. While
AOP is a good answer to many common system integration problems, and is
therefore an already well established practi
Hi Simone,
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Simone Gianni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> thanks for your positive vote.
>
> Yes, I looked at Qi4J and I find it an extremely interesting project.
>
It's something very interesting in the AOP landscape but I guess you're all
over it.
>
> H
Hi Alex,
thanks for your positive vote.
Yes, I looked at Qi4J and I find it an extremely interesting project.
However, while taking the same philosophy of overcoming OO limitations
using AOP, providing highly reusable fragments and giving many
out-of-the-box functionalities, I find the "plain AOP
+1
Simone have you had a look at http://www.qi4j.org/ yet?
Alex
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> +1
>>
>> On 08/09/2008, at 3:19 AM, Simone Gianni wrote:
>>
>> Dear researchers,
>>>
>>>
+1
On Sep 7, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
+1
On 08/09/2008, at 3:19 AM, Simone Gianni wrote:
Dear researchers,
lately I've been playing around with AOP and related technologies to
overcome the common code reuse and extension limitations in Java.
While
AOP is a good answer to many
+1
On 08/09/2008, at 3:19 AM, Simone Gianni wrote:
Dear researchers,
lately I've been playing around with AOP and related technologies to
overcome the common code reuse and extension limitations in Java.
While
AOP is a good answer to many common system integration problems, and
is
therefo
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 19:19 +0200, Simone Gianni wrote:
> Dear researchers,
...
> So, I'm asking for a lab named Magma. There I'd like to research the
> possibility to use a strongly "AOPized" approach to application
> development and integration of various Apache technologies, in the field
> of (b
Roland Weber wrote:
+1, sounds interesting.
I take it this will be a non-Java project? C or C++?
Yes, my intention is pure C for now
-Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
+1, sounds interesting.
I take it this will be a non-Java project? C or C++?
cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El vie, 15-02-2008 a las 10:45 -0800, Paul Querna escribió:
> I would like a lab to build a modern implementation of RFC 2289[1], A
> One-Time Password System (OTP), also known as OPIE or S/Key. The Lab
> would be named "Orthrus"[2].
>
+1
> OPIE[3] is the most common implementation available
On Feb 15, 2008 7:45 PM, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like a lab to build a modern implementation of RFC 2289[1], A
> One-Time Password System (OTP), also known as OPIE or S/Key. The Lab
> would be named "Orthrus"[2].
+1
-Bertrand
+1
On Feb 15, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
I would like a lab to build a modern implementation of RFC 2289[1],
A One-Time Password System (OTP), also known as OPIE or S/Key. The
Lab would be named "Orthrus"[2].
OPIE[3] is the most common implementation available, and its last
re
Paul Querna wrote:
I would like a lab to build a modern implementation of RFC 2289[1], A
One-Time Password System (OTP), also known as OPIE or S/Key. The Lab
would be named "Orthrus"[2].
+1 (non-binding)
Bernd
-
To unsub
On 15.02.2008, at 19:45, Paul Querna wrote:
I would like a lab to build a modern implementation of RFC 2289[1],
A One-Time Password System (OTP), also known as OPIE or S/Key. The
Lab would be named "Orthrus"[2].
+1!
This code would align with the Apache Infrastructure's use of OTP
for a
I'm encouraged that the overhead for opening an incubator is less than I had
thought, so I'll begin drafting a proposal for an incubator. Thanks to all
for the help and advice and putting me straight, and I look forward to your
continued help over on the incubator list once I have a first draft p
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -1 (I assume non-binding ; just a contrary vote...)
>
> I think that such a project should be an incubator podling or in
> Tuscany itself. Seems weird as a lab.
-1
Agree with Geir. The fact that it's being seeded from code that would
have to
Roland Weber wrote:
I assume that the formal overhead of starting a podling is
considered a problem here: putting together a lengthy proposal,
finding a Champion and Sponsor, discussing the proposal on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and attracting three mentors.
Which might mean that the myth and percepti
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> On Jan 4, 2008 1:45 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We'd like to propose the creation of a new lab for the purpose of
developing the reference implementation and technology compliance kit
for Java... The reference
implementation wo
On Jan 4, 2008 1:45 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We'd like to propose the creation of a new lab for the purpose of
developing the reference implementation and technology compliance kit
for Java... The reference
implementation would be seeded by a contribution of code from BEA,
kelvin goodson wrote:
> The thinking is that the lab would allow us to be agile at this early stage
> as we'd like to deal with the issues of community overlap separately at a
> slightly later stage.
Like Geir, this feels weird to me. Wouldn't a sandbox in
Tuscany or elsewhere give you the agility
The thinking is that the lab would allow us to be agile at this early stage
as we'd like to deal with the issues of community overlap separately at a
slightly later stage.
Kelvin.
On 04/01/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any reason not to go straight to an Incubator project?
>
-1 (I assume non-binding ; just a contrary vote...)
I think that such a project should be an incubator podling or in
Tuscany itself. Seems weird as a lab.
On Jan 4, 2008, at 4:45 PM, kelvin goodson wrote:
We'd like to propose the creation of a new lab for the purpose of
developing
the
Any reason not to go straight to an Incubator project?
Hen
On Jan 4, 2008 1:45 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'd like to propose the creation of a new lab for the purpose of developing
> the reference implementation and technology compliance kit for Java
> Specification Request
+1
Only just got round to reading this, sorry.
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
- Shane
Bad, naughty CA! You should have given that nice young man his
certificate, instead of chewing it up!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Nov 21, 2007 8:39 PM, David Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Thanks to those how voted!...
Ouch - missed that, but +1 !
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:09 AM, David Reid wrote:
>
>> This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new version of
>> BaDCA.
>
> Very +1
There appear to have been more than 3 +1's and the required 72 hours
have now passed, so I'm working on the assumption that
On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:09 AM, David Reid wrote:
This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new
version of
BaDCA.
Very +1
S.
--
Sander Temme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signatur
+1
On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:09 AM, David Reid wrote:
This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new
version of
BaDCA.
The lab name will (ideally) be badca.
The intention is to take the existing code and perform a complete
rewrite moving from Perl to Python to try and allow a gr
+1
Niall
David Reid wrote:
This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new version of
BaDCA.
The lab name will (ideally) be badca.
The intention is to take the existing code and perform a complete
rewrite moving from Perl to Python to try and allow a greater number of
committers
+1
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:09 PM, David Reid wrote:
This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new
version of
BaDCA.
The lab name will (ideally) be badca.
The intention is to take the existing code and perform a complete
rewrite moving from Perl to Python to try and allow a gre
David Reid wrote:
> This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new version of
> BaDCA.
>
> The lab name will (ideally) be badca.
>
> The intention is to take the existing code and perform a complete
> rewrite moving from Perl to Python to try and allow a greater number of
> committ
On Nov 16, 2007 2:09 PM, David Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new version of
> BaDCA.
>
> The lab name will (ideally) be badca.
>
> The intention is to take the existing code and perform a complete
> rewrite moving from Perl to Python to
On 16.11.2007, at 20:09, David Reid wrote:
This is a request for a lab to allow for development of a new
version of
BaDCA.
The lab name will (ideally) be badca.
The intention is to take the existing code and perform a complete
rewrite moving from Perl to Python to try and allow a greater
n
On 29/10/2007, Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to request the creation of a new Apache Lab: JINX.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Absolutely, +1.
-Original Message-
From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:32 PM
To: labs@labs.apache.org
Subject: Re: [LAB-REQUEST] JINX: An XML Pipeline Language Processor
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Ugo Cei wrote:
>> I'd like
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
I'd like to request the creation of a new Apache Lab: JINX.
JINX (which stands for JINX Is Not XProc) is a processor for the XProc
XML Pipeline Language [1].
XProc is a language for describing operations to be performed on XML
documents.
[...]
+1
So
On 10/29/07, Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I'd like to request the creation of a new Apache Lab: JINX
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to request the creation of a new Apache Lab: JINX.
JINX (which stands for JINX Is Not XProc) is a processor for the
XProc XML Pipeline Language [1].
Just to not, not sure if it depends: Jinx is alos the name of a
commercial
Hi!
I'd like to request the creation of a new Apache Lab: JINX.
JINX (which stands for JINX Is Not XProc) is a processor for the XProc
XML Pipeline Language [1].
Just to not, not sure if it depends: Jinx is alos the name of a
commercial company [1] selling clothin stuff through the internet.
Ugo Cei wrote:
I'd like to request the creation of a new Apache Lab: JINX.
JINX (which stands for JINX Is Not XProc) is a processor for the XProc
XML Pipeline Language [1].
XProc is a language for describing operations to be performed on XML
documents.
[...]
+1
--
Reinhard Pötz
So as a conclusion I'll go ahead and create the lab as Discordia if nobody
objects. I think it's still a good description of the licensing problems but
maybe a bit more politically correct than Succubi. I'll just keep Succubi
for another project :)
Thanks to all!
On 9/18/07, Thorsten Scherler <[E
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:25 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Why? Dealing with licensing issues leaves me heartbroken, filled with
> hate and despair. Seems right on, actually :)
>
+1
(Thanks for Stefano to pin point as well the Italian meaning).
In the end the licenses jungle is the fun
Why? Dealing with licensing issues leaves me heartbroken, filled with
hate and despair. Seems right on, actually :)
Geir
On Sep 18, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 9/18/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18/09/2007,
On 9/18/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/14/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> hi Matthieu
>
> glad that you've managed to find a home for this now :-)
>
> > Incubi is a set of scripts that:
> >
> > 1. Index all artifacts in a Maven repository, ext
On 9/18/07, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succubus
>
> A female demon seductress (sometimes talking the form of a beautiful
> woman) that would lure many men to her, making those men fall in love
> with her and give their hearts to the succubus an
On 9/18/07, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succubus
>
> A female demon seductress (sometimes talking the form of a beautiful
> woman) that would lure many men to her, making those men fall in love
> with her and give their hearts to the succubus
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 9/18/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 18/09/2007, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 9/18/07, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A bit transgenderish, but how about succubi? Incubi and Succubi used to
work together, as you can
Hey,
On 9/18/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/09/2007, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/18/07, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > A bit transgenderish, but how about succubi? Incubi and Succubi used to
> > > work together, as you can read at Wikipedia
On 9/14/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
hi Matthieu
glad that you've managed to find a home for this now :-)
> Incubi is a set of scripts that:
>
> 1. Index all artifacts in a Maven repository, extracting their respective
> license information.
(before my injury) i made some
On 18/09/2007, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A bit transgenderish, but how about succubi? Incubi and Succubi used to
> > work together, as you can read at Wikipedia :)
>
>
> Succubi sounds pretty good, a bit of feminity in th
On 9/18/07, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A bit transgenderish, but how about succubi? Incubi and Succubi used to
> work together, as you can read at Wikipedia :)
Succubi sounds pretty good, a bit of feminity in this macho world :) Thanks
to you and Thorsten for the nice propositio
El lun, 17-09-2007 a las 21:48 -0700, Matthieu Riou escribió:
> On 9/17/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd prefer a different name. A bit too close to "Incubator". Otherwise,
> > fine with me.
>
>
> Yeah, I actually realized it after posting the request, don't know why
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 21:48 -0700, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd prefer a different name. A bit too close to "Incubator". Otherwise,
> > fine with me.
>
>
> Yeah, I actually realized it after posting the request, don't know why it
> n
On 9/17/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd prefer a different name. A bit too close to "Incubator". Otherwise,
> fine with me.
Yeah, I actually realized it after posting the request, don't know why it
never crossed my mind before. Anyway I'll try to find something better
b
I'd prefer a different name. A bit too close to "Incubator". Otherwise,
fine with me.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 72 hours period is passed and there are 3 positive votes. Can I go ahead
and create the lab?
Thanks!
Matthieu
On 9/15/07, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
> > I've been playing for some time with the idea of a global license index
> for
> > all open source
Matthieu Riou wrote:
I've been playing for some time with the idea of a global license index for
all open source "artifacts" (jar, war, gem, whatever). This would basically
tell you for a given project artifact which license(s) apply. I think this
would be a good fit for a lab.
+1.
Regards,
G
On 9/14/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I've been playing for some time with the idea of a global license index for
> all open source "artifacts" (jar, war, gem, whatever). This would basically
> tell you for a given project artifact which license(s) apply. I think this
> would be
Matthieu Riou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been playing for some time with the idea of a global license index for
> all open source "artifacts" (jar, war, gem, whatever). This would basically
> tell you for a given project artifact which license(s) apply. I think this
> would be a good fit for a lab.
>
David Reid wrote:
Well, there is code and I'm trying to figure out how to handle some of
the more exotic aspects of my ideas to allow remote and indiscriminate
posting to be handled... If you have other ideas we'd love to hear them.
One aspect I want to look at is tying in the DOAP files with
Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Dunno when I really have time to concentrate, but I'd like to help.
>
> Yes, we're community based and meritocratic and all that stuff. And in
> some cases we have great tools to help get work done (ant, maven, etc.,
> along with mailing lists and wikis). But a lot of the
On 14/06/07, Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dunno when I really have time to concentrate, but I'd like to help.
Yes, we're community based and meritocratic and all that stuff. And
in some cases we have great tools to help get work done (ant, maven,
etc., along with mailing lists and w
Dunno when I really have time to concentrate, but I'd like to help.
Yes, we're community based and meritocratic and all that stuff. And
in some cases we have great tools to help get work done (ant, maven,
etc., along with mailing lists and wikis). But a lot of the work of
the foundation itse
Hi Ugo,
Sounds good! ... except the possible name collision:
http://nucleuscms.org/
Trustin
On 5/25/07, Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
I'd like to request the creation of a new Apache Lab: Nucleus.
Nucleus is a Java framework for building content stores based on the
principles o
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
