Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-24 Thread Bryan Davis
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:25 PM, tom29739 wrote: > The Mailman docs have some information on who gets to post to lists: > https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node20.html. The > "Sender filters" section > (https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/sender-filters.html) > of t

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-24 Thread tom29739
The Mailman docs have some information on who gets to post to lists: https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node20.html. The "Sender filters" section (https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/sender-filters.html) of those docs says how to hold, reject, or discard messages from

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-21 Thread Bryan Davis
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Platonides wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Andre Klapper > wrote: >> >> Looking at the mail headers I see >> X-Spam-Score: 6.5 (++) >> X-Spam-Report: [...] (6.5 points, 4.0 required) >> which makes me wonder why this did not end up in moderation

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-21 Thread Platonides
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > Looking at the mail headers I see > X-Spam-Score: 6.5 (++) > X-Spam-Report: [...] (6.5 points, 4.0 required) > which makes me wonder why this did not end up in moderation / dropped. > > Also curious about DMARC and nonmembers setting

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-20 Thread Pine W
Other lists have been getting more spam in the past few weeks as well. Not sure how much effort it's worth to crack down on this, but spam is annoying and if you multiply the amount of wasted time on a per-person basis across a few thousand people, that adds up quickly. Pine Pine On Mon, Feb 20

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-20 Thread Andre Klapper
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 13:17 -0600, Andrew Bogott wrote: > On 2/16/17 8:07 AM, Maximilian Doerr wrote: > > How’d it get on the list?  Isn’t it moderated? >  By default, list members are able to post unmoderated.  Posts from > non-list-members ought to be automatically discarded.  I'm not clear > how

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-17 Thread Andrew Bogott
On 2/16/17 8:07 AM, Maximilian Doerr wrote: How’d it get on the list? Isn’t it moderated? By default, list members are able to post unmoderated. Posts from non-list-members ought to be automatically discarded. I'm not clear how this particular message got through -- I don't see evidence that

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-16 Thread Maximilian Doerr
How’d it get on the list? Isn’t it moderated? Cyberpower678 English Wikipedia Account Creation Team English Wikipedia Administrator Global User Renamer > On Feb 16, 2017, at 09:05, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote: > > 2017-02-15 23:38 GMT-05:00 Maximilian Doerr >

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-16 Thread Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
2017-02-15 23:38 GMT-05:00 Maximilian Doerr : > What the hell is this? > Probably a macro virus trying to spread itself, although it's possible it's just a completely off-topic post (Google Translate makes the text sound like some workers' rights thing). -- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Senior Software

Re: [Labs-l] labs-l:如何处理员工违纪问题? 6dkn7m

2017-02-15 Thread Maximilian Doerr
What the hell is this? Cyberpower678 English Wikipedia Account Creation Team English Wikipedia Administrator Global User Renamer > On Feb 15, 2017, at 23:30, 倪若雁 wrote: > > labs-l: 您好 > > 1.如何预防劳动者的“应聘欺诈”，如何证明劳动者的“欺诈”？ > 2.招收应届毕业生，应注意哪些细节问题？ > 3.招用达到法定退休年龄的人员，应注意哪些细节问题？ > 4.招用待岗、内退、停薪留职的人员，应