Tamara quoted Jo Falkink's observation:
it takes *3* strands of .1mm wire to replace on strand of .2mm - more than
one would expect by simple mathematical calculation.
Actually, two wires side-by-side become a flat ribbon--remember the wire
can't deform or compress its shape--while three wires
Hi everyone, and Tamara, and Brenda
It's none of my nevermind because I don't do wire - but (I'll say it
anyway) wouldn't a chart of 'wires for lace' be better at someone's site
with other info about lacemaking with wire?
For 'threads for lace' we can nip back and forth among the fibre content -
On Jun 23, 2005, at 15:54, Brenda Paternoster wrote (in response to my
message):
But wire should be easier (famous last words?), so perhaps, I'll have
a go at it (during the Convention week and between the bouts of
canning g)
Will you be writing Wires for Lace? ;-)
No way! But, any
