W dniu 2012-05-31 22:52, Daniel Naber pisze:
> Hi,
>
> there are quite some false alarms for the ARTICLE_MISSING rule[1]. Does
> anybody have a problem with disabling it by default?
Well, I like this rule as we don't have articles in Polish at all and I
don't understand why would anyone want them
Hi,
there are quite some false alarms for the ARTICLE_MISSING rule[1]. Does
anybody have a problem with disabling it by default?
Regards
Daniel
[1]
http://community.languagetool.org/corpusMatch/list?filter=ARTICLE_MISSING
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---
Hi,
as the rule files are the core of most languages for LT, we should make
their license very clear. So if you're a rule maintainer, please add a
reference to the appropriate license. See de/grammar.xml for an example.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---
On Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> The changes to grammar.xml are unrelated. The changes to
> disambiguation.xml are indirectly related.
Thanks again for your patch, I have committed all changes. I made a
separate commit with small cleanups so you can easily see my changes
2012/5/31 Daniel Naber
> On Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
>
> Thanks, looks good. Maybe the match() method can become a bit shorter by
> extracting some code to private methods?
I don't see any easy way to do it. The whole Java rule is equivalent to
about 30 pattern rul
LanguageTool works for me as LibO 3.5.3 extension under Win XP SP3.
After experiencing problems at first, I went through the following
(admittedly VERY cumbersome) steps, and finally it worked:
- Uninstall LibO
- Uninstall any existing versions of Java (I happened to have several)
- Delete any lef
On Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> I send you a patch with a new Java rule for Catalan. As I said, it is
> just a more o less complex pattern rule (in fact a rule group) that
> uses two long lists of word pairs as data. There is also a test for the
> rule. Let me know if it
On Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, Piotr wrote:
> Just checked. Indeed it does not freeze on startup.
Great. This fix will probably also make it into Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1,
targeted for July.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Feature+Planning
Regards
Daniel
--
http:
On Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, gulp21 wrote:
> Does anyone know whether the "Could not create Java implementation
> loader" problem is solved in 3.5.4?
No, we still don't know the reason for that error.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
--
Does anyone know whether the "Could not create Java implementation
loader" problem is solved in 3.5.4? A few days ago, I tried to install
LT in LibO 3.5.3 on a computer of a friend of mine (running XP SP3,
latest version of Java), and that error message was shown. The possible
solution mentione
Just checked. Indeed it does not freeze on startup.
Regards,
Piotr
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
>
> LibreOffice 3.5.4 has just been released and it's the first release that
> fixes
> the annoying freeze-on-startup bug that occurred with LanguageTool.
>
> If there are no
11 matches
Mail list logo