Juan Martorell wrote:
>> In French grammar.xml, I have some very long regexp,
>> and LT is still fast. I prefer to find as many errors as I can
>> with as fewer false positive as possible. For speed, I try
>> to optimize regexp if I can, but not at the price removing
>> rules and finding less er
On 6 June 2014 23:00, Dominique Pellé wrote:
>
> Glancing at the Spanish regexp, I spot those that could
> perhaps be written in a more efficient way:
>
> In rule "PP_V_QUE
> postag="VM.*3.*"
>
> postag="VM..3.*"
>
> "N.*|C.*" -> "[NC].*"
>
> But I doubt it will make a big difference overall.
