Hi,
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 21:47:40 +0200 от Dominique Pellé:
Hi
I've noticed that the Russian and Dutch
compounds.txt files contain duplicate entries.
Either the dupes should be removed, or maybe
some of the dupe were meant to be the plural
form or some other flexions. Can the language
maintainers
Yakov Reztsov yakovr...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi,
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 21:47:40 +0200 от Dominique Pellé:
Hi
I've noticed that the Russian and Dutch
compounds.txt files contain duplicate entries.
Either the dupes should be removed, or maybe
some of the dupe were meant to be the plural
form or
Hi Daniel,
The problem is corrected.
As best I remember, many months ago, when I did the LT server test, LT
server worked on the machine.
Some observations:
1) Yesterday, I disabled the anti-virus/firewall software and LT server
worked fine for a short time. Then the problem started again.
2)
On 2014-10-06 23:05, dna...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
1.
http://languagetool.org/regression-tests/20141006/result_en_20141006.html
FYI, the lower part of the English diff was caused by this Exception,
which I unfortunately cannot reproduce:
Exception in thread main
Hi,
a question to the developers: are you happy with your workflow when
making changes to LT? Is anything too slow?
Here's what I mean by workflow:
* I typically make a change to the source or the rules
* I run ./build.sh de test, which takes 30 seconds on my machine
* when everything is fine,
Hi,
our new rule that checks a date and its day of the week is very useful,
I used it to find more than 200 errors in the German-language Wikipedia
(I think I mentioned that):
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Dnaber/WikiCon2014#Weitere_Beispiel-Fehler
If you have more ideas for such
About more semantic rule, what about time consistency?
About the date check, I have been looking at the code, wanting to make a
Dutch version, but there is no locale that fits Netherlands and Belgium;
in fact there is none.
Is there a way to work around that?
Ruud
Hi,
our new rule that
Hi Ruud
You can have a look at the Java files DateCheckFilter.java for
Catalan, Breton or Esperanto, for which there is also no Java
locale.
Dominique
PM, R.J. Baars r.j.ba...@xs4all.nl wrote:
About more semantic rule, what about time consistency?
About the date check, I have been looking
It is better to disable the rule:
OT_EINDE_ZIN_ONVERWACHT [1]
And there is still quite a bit of output showing wiki markup.
Would it be an idea to:
- make a javascript component for the wiki page, interpreting the page
layout (which is html then) and checking the texts from that point?
Ruud
On 2014-10-07 13:51, R.J. Baars wrote:
It was not too difficult to translate that. I attached my proposal.
I am not able however to add it to the Dutch codebase and test it, so
if
someone has some time to spare ...
I have added it. You will still need to add a rule in grammar.xml like
the
On 2014-10-07 14:05, R.J. Baars wrote:
Would it be an idea to:
- make a javascript component for the wiki page, interpreting the page
layout (which is html then) and checking the texts from that point?
That's similar to what I posted the other day: the proper solution is to
use Parsoid,
I know. I will check the existing rules for EN and DE. Probably re-usable.
Will get the updated build tomorrow.
Ruud
On 2014-10-07 13:51, R.J. Baars wrote:
It was not too difficult to translate that. I attached my proposal.
I am not able however to add it to the Dutch codebase and test it,
Daniel, one of the date checks was commented out.
I think it could still be of use, if the ambiguous items were removed,
e.g. using antipattern.
Somewhat like this?
(Was not able to test it yet..)
Ruud
!-- Monday 31/12/2014 - this can be ambiguous (e.g.
6/7/2014) and is thus
That's very similar to my workflow, except before I commit I run my
rules on huge (5-10 years) archive of 4 Ukrainian magazines, which
shows if my rules really work and don't have false positives and which
takes about 40 min.
So even if I would not mind for build.sh to be a bit faster it
probably
Will the entries below be necessary to have the datechecker working?
Ruud
!--suppress CheckTagEmptyBody --
!DOCTYPE rules [
!ENTITY weekdays
maandag|dinsdag|woensdag|donderdag|vrijdag|zaterdag|zondag
!ENTITY abbrevWeekdays ma|di|wo|do|za|zo
!ENTITY months
On 2014-10-07 18:39, R.J. Baars wrote:
Will the entries below be necessary to have the datechecker working?
Ruud
!--suppress CheckTagEmptyBody --
!DOCTYPE rules [
!ENTITY weekdays
maandag|dinsdag|woensdag|donderdag|vrijdag|zaterdag|zondag
Only if you refer to the definitions with
So this is a kind of 'macro'..
Good to know that exists. Might come in handy for some type of exceptions..
Ruud
On 2014-10-07 18:39, R.J. Baars wrote:
Will the entries below be necessary to have the datechecker working?
Ruud
!--suppress CheckTagEmptyBody --
!DOCTYPE rules [
!ENTITY
17 matches
Mail list logo