Dominique Pellé wrote:
Multi-threading was introduced in LT-2.7 but above numbers don't show
> improvements. Maybe I needed to use a bigger document than 500 lines.
>
I need to correct this: it's LT-2.3 which introduced multi-threading.
I also made more measurements with older versions. Here is
Hi
I measured LT speed using command line version of LanguageTool.
Recorded numbers are user time reported by Linux time command.
Measurements were made on my laptop:
- xubuntu-14.04.3
- i5-3317U CPU, 1.7Ghz, 4 cores, SSD
- java version "1.8.0_60"
I measured:
- several versions of LT (from 1.8 to
On 2015-10-24 16:52, Juan Martorell wrote:
> Latest dictionary in LO5 comes with version 0.8. However in LT source
> code repository I see the version 0.2.
So can't we just update the version in LT to improve support a lot, with
little work for us?
> Extending the Spanish dictionary is an endea
On 2015-10-23 18:52, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
> The two first issues are solved. The last one not: composing a message
> in gmail. In plain text mode, the line breaks disappear. In html mode,
> all formatting disappears.
I understand the problem now, but it will take some time to fix.
Regards
> This is quite high on my TODO, although it sounds like it would make
> more sense to extend the Spanish dictionary in general? Are we already
> using the latest dictionary from LibreOffice?
>
>
Latest dictionary in LO5 comes with version 0.8. However in LT source code
repository I see the version
Hi Dominique
A common mistake, I often see, is that dot is replaced by
comma.http://www.google,com
/Esben Aaberg
Fra: Dominique Pellé
Til: languagetool-devel
Sendt: 5:31 lørdag den 24. oktober 2015
Emne: Rule to check common mistakes in URL
Hi
I've added a rule in French grammar.x
On 24.10.2015 11:29, Dominique Pellé wrote:
> Purodha Blissenbach wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>http:/www.google.com (there should be 2 slashes after
>>> protocole)
>>
>> This is valid, at least protocolwise. I refers to a directory
>> /www.google.com on the current server. Good warning, of course
Purodha Blissenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>http:/www.google.com (there should be 2 slashes after
>> protocole)
>
> This is valid, at least protocolwise. I refers to a directory
> /www.google.com on the current server. Good warning, of course, if there
> is at least a dot in there.
>
> Purodha
