Re: updating to Morfologik 2.1.0

2016-03-08 Thread Jaume Ortolà i Font
2016-03-08 18:02 GMT+01:00 Marcin Miłkowski : > I think it's almost completely irrelevant. And for some languages, the > differences are much bigger (e.g., for Polish), so fsa5 is definitely > not the best format. So please go ahead with CFSA2. > Ok. In any case, there is no

Re: IntelliJ 15

2016-03-08 Thread Juan Martorell
Hi Armando, On 8 March 2016 at 03:33, Armando Cabarcas wrote: > Please, delete my email addres from your list, thanks. > I kindly remind you that you can unsubscribe via this link: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel That link is footer of

updating to Morfologik 2.1.0

2016-03-08 Thread Jaume Ortolà i Font
Hi, I have done the changes required in LT for updating to Morfologik 2.1.0. You can see them in the branch "updatemorfologik" (a code clean-up is pending). Someone should test these changes before I push them. The inputs for the dictionary builders are the same as before. As for the ouputs,

Re: IntelliJ 15

2016-03-08 Thread Armando Cabarcas
Please, delete my email addres from your list, thanks. On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Daniel Naber wrote: > Hi, > > if you're developing Java code in LT and haven't updated to IntelliJ 15 > yet, I recommend doing so. The most notable new feature from my point of