Excellent. 5000 articles is enough for the time being. Hopefully this
will encourage some contributors from "outside."
Am 03.06.2012 01:15, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, Daniel Naber wrote:
>
> New feature: each rule is now automatically checked against a subset of
> Wikiped
On Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, Daniel Naber wrote:
> > A very good idea. However, I find it a bit unclear where exactly the
> > suggestion is taken from: From the corrected sentence, or from the
> > user's error message.
>
> Thanks, I have implemented most of the feedback from you and others.
New fe
On Montag, 28. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> A very good idea. However, I find it a bit unclear where exactly the
> suggestion is taken from: From the corrected sentence, or from the
> user's error message.
Thanks, I have implemented most of the feedback from you and others.
Regards
Daniel
Daniel,
I succeeded in creating prototype rules from the annotations file, a bit
like your easy rules editor.
600 rules in one run. None has been tested yet though. That is the next step.
Ruud
--
Live Security Virtual C
I think I will follow your concept and wriote a script like that myself.
Op 30-05-12 19:11, Daniel Naber schreef:
> On Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, Ruud Baars wrote:
>
>> I could supply the errr as well
> Is that public data? If so, could you post the URL to it? Someone might
> then write the small scr
On Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, Ruud Baars wrote:
> I could supply the errr as well
Is that public data? If so, could you post the URL to it? Someone might
then write the small script to turn that into XML rules.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---
ect.
Regards,
Mike Unwalla
Contact: www.techscribe.co.uk/techw/contact.htm
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:list2...@danielnaber.de]
Sent: 28 May 2012 21:18
To: languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Languagetool] online rule creator
Hi,
I have uploaded a r
I could supply the errr as well
Daniel Naber schreef:
>On Dienstag, 29. Mai 2012, R.J. Baars wrote:
>
>> More generally, i could supply:
>>
>> correct : Word word error1 error2 word word.
>> incorrect: Word word correct word word.
>
>This is a bit different from what the rule editor page does n
On Dienstag, 29. Mai 2012, R.J. Baars wrote:
> More generally, i could supply:
>
> correct : Word word error1 error2 word word.
> incorrect: Word word correct word word.
This is a bit different from what the rule editor page does now, as we'd
need to find the error pattern first. Not too diffi
Daniel,
Would it also be possible to do this as a 'web service'?
I have lots of sentences that have been edited to correct them.
So I could easily supply correct and incorrect sentences.
More generally, i could supply:
correct : Word word error1 error2 word word.
incorrect: Word word correct w
Works nicely.
Some suggestions:
- field defaults per language
- id number, does it auto-increment? Why not use the name?
- add url option
Anyway, it is a great addition.
Daniel Naber schreef:
>Hi,
>
>I have uploaded a rule creator at
>
>http://community.languagetool.org/ruleEditor
>
>It's suppose
A very good idea. However, I find it a bit unclear where exactly the
suggestion is taken from: From the corrected sentence, or from the
user's error message.
"Error Message with correction in single quotation marks" would probably
make it a bit clearer, although it is not exactly elegant.
Am 28.0
Hi,
I have uploaded a rule creator at
http://community.languagetool.org/ruleEditor
It's supposed to be a help for non-experienced users that have never
written a rule before. Thus to keep the interface simple, several features
of the rule syntax have been left out. Users don't have to know abo
13 matches
Mail list logo
