Yakov Reztsov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Mon, 6 Oct 2014 21:47:40 +0200 от Dominique Pellé:
>
> Hi
>
> I've noticed that the Russian and Dutch
> "compounds.txt" files contain duplicate entries.
> Either the dupes should be removed, or maybe
> some of the dupe were meant to be the plural
> form or some ot
Hi,
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 21:47:40 +0200 от Dominique Pellé:
>Hi
>
>I've noticed that the Russian and Dutch
>"compounds.txt" files contain duplicate entries.
>Either the dupes should be removed, or maybe
>some of the dupe were meant to be the plural
>form or some other flexions. Can the language
>maint
Hi Ruud
Duplicate entries are at best not necessary, so they
should be removed. But at worse, it can be that the
intention was to put a plural for example. I found
such errors in the French compound.txt where
I had the word "casse-gueule" twice instead of
having "casse-gueule" and "casse-gueules"
Done for Dutch.
It is not really a problem, is it?
Ruud
> Hi
>
> I've noticed that the Russian and Dutch
> "compounds.txt" files contain duplicate entries.
> Either the dupes should be removed, or maybe
> some of the dupe were meant to be the plural
> form or some other flexions. Can the languag
Hi
I've noticed that the Russian and Dutch
"compounds.txt" files contain duplicate entries.
Either the dupes should be removed, or maybe
some of the dupe were meant to be the plural
form or some other flexions. Can the language
maintainers check the duplicate entries in the
following compounds.txt
