Am 09.02.2013 09:49, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 08.02.2013, 21:49:54 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> in the manual I advise users to use a personal dictionary with the
>> external spell-checker to cope with false positives. Is that possible
>> for an ordinary user with LanguageTool
>
> No, that's not
On 08.02.2013, 21:49:54 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Ignored by all of LanguageTool's modules or by Hunspell only as the file
> path suggests?
Only by hunspell.
> The spelling package provides it's own white list mechanism. But since
> it relies on an external spell-checker for finding misspellings
Am 08.02.2013 21:16, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 08.02.2013, 19:51:18 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> 3. Is there a way to use a user dictionary for spell-checking with
>> LanguageTool? That is, a file containing correct spellings (false
>> positives).
>
> There's resource/XX/hunspell/ignore.txt (XX b
On 08.02.2013, 19:51:18 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> 3. Is there a way to use a user dictionary for spell-checking with
> LanguageTool? That is, a file containing correct spellings (false
> positives).
There's resource/XX/hunspell/ignore.txt (XX being the language code). these
words are ignored duri
Am 06.02.2013 19:42, schrieb Stephan Hennig:
> To get LanguageTool and the spelling package together, I have the
> following requests/questions:
3. Is there a way to use a user dictionary for spell-checking with
LanguageTool? That is, a file containing correct spellings (false
positives).
Best
Am 08.02.2013 10:49, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 07.02.2013, 20:56:28 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with that. What about locqualityissuetype? Will that
>> attribute support other languages than English any time soon?
>
> If these are useful for you, you could try to promote them by, well,
On 07.02.2013, 20:56:28 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> I'm fine with that. What about locqualityissuetype? Will that
> attribute support other languages than English any time soon?
If these are useful for you, you could try to promote them by, well,
telling LT maintainers that you really need those :
Am 07.02.2013 20:56, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 07.02.2013, 20:48:39 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> Is there, in turn, a way to disable spelling
>> suggestions for languages where spelling suggestions are supported?
>
> No, all you can do is ignore them.
The question was aiming at saving a little b
On 07.02.2013, 20:48:39 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Is there, in turn, a way to disable spelling
> suggestions for languages where spelling suggestions are supported?
No, all you can do is ignore them.
> What is the JAR file to run on the command-line? There is no
> LanguageTool.jar in the latest
Am 07.02.2013 20:27, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> What about adding another XML attribute to the output like
> spelling_rule="true"?
I'm fine with that. What about locqualityissuetype? Will that
attribute support other languages than English any time soon?
Best regards,
Stephan Hennig
---
Am 07.02.2013 20:30, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 07.02.2013, 20:14:24 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> No spelling suggestion. Why is that?
>
> Sorry, I forgot to mention in my reply that the list of "no suggestion"
> languages referred to current SVN. For German, spelling suggestions are not
> yet i
On 07.02.2013, 20:14:24 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> No spelling suggestion. Why is that?
Sorry, I forgot to mention in my reply that the list of "no suggestion"
languages referred to current SVN. For German, spelling suggestions are not
yet in LT 2.0, the latest release.
BTW, we provide nightly s
On 07.02.2013, 19:41:13 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Is it safe to scan for rule names starting 'MORFOLOGIK_RULE_' or can
> that cause clashes with non-spelling related rules?
It should be safe, but there's no guarantee for it. What about adding
another XML attribute to the output like spelling_rule=
Am 07.02.2013 19:53, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 07.02.2013, 19:19:44 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> How do I activate Hunspell suggestions using LanguageTool on the
>> command-line?
>
> You can't - some languages don't support generating spelling suggestions
> yet (for performance reasons). Currentl
On 07.02.2013, 19:19:44 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> How do I activate Hunspell suggestions using LanguageTool on the
> command-line?
You can't - some languages don't support generating spelling suggestions
yet (for performance reasons). Currently these languages are: da, eo, fr,
is, pt. These are t
Am 06.02.2013 21:37, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 06.02.2013, 21:18:16 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> What are the rule IDs that identify spelling errors? I've seen
>> ruleId="HUNSPELL_NO_SUGGEST_RULE". Anything else?
>
> GERMAN_SPELLER_RULE
> HUNSPELL_RULE
>
> and
> MORFOLOGIK_RULE__
> for example:
Daniel Naber wrote:
> On 07.02.2013, 18:13:55 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> Whatever names they have, is there any reference where I can look for
>> the exact meaning of those rules?
>
> The rule ids I listed are all spell checking rules that only differ by their
> implementation. As a user of the XM
Am 06.02.2013 22:00, schrieb Dominique Pellé:
> There is also: HUNSPELL_NO_SUGGEST_RULE
In HunspellNoSuggestionRule.java I find this comment
> /**
> * Like {@link HunspellRule}, but does not offer suggestions for incorrect
> words
> * as that is very slow with Hunspell.
> */
How do I activ
On 07.02.2013, 18:52:42 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Is the point of that rule to try
> alternative spellings of a word in case the original spelling is not
> recognized as valid?
Yes, but all spelling rules do that (except the no_suggestion one). The
character substitutions in GermanSpellerRule only
Am 07.02.2013 18:22, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 07.02.2013, 18:13:55 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> Whatever names they have, is there any reference where I can look for
>> the exact meaning of those rules?
>
> The rule ids I listed are all spell checking rules that only differ by their
> implementa
On 07.02.2013, 18:13:55 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Whatever names they have, is there any reference where I can look for
> the exact meaning of those rules?
The rule ids I listed are all spell checking rules that only differ by their
implementation. As a user of the XML, you should not case about t
Am 06.02.2013 22:00, schrieb Dominique Pellé:
> Daniel Naber wrote:
>> On 06.02.2013, 21:18:16 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>>
>>> What are the rule IDs that identify spelling errors? I've seen
>>> ruleId="HUNSPELL_NO_SUGGEST_RULE". Anything else?
>>
>> GERMAN_SPELLER_RULE
>> HUNSPELL_RULE
>>
>> and
>>
Am 06.02.2013 20:50, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 06.02.2013, 19:42:09 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> Could you please provide a way (a command-line option) so that
>> LanguageTool writes the list of misspelled words as one word per
>> line?
>
> I think this can be parsed from the XML easily: take the
Daniel Naber wrote:
> On 06.02.2013, 21:18:16 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> What are the rule IDs that identify spelling errors? I've seen
>> ruleId="HUNSPELL_NO_SUGGEST_RULE". Anything else?
>
> GERMAN_SPELLER_RULE
> HUNSPELL_RULE
>
> and
> MORFOLOGIK_RULE__
> for example:
> MORFOLOGIK_RULE_CA_ES
On 06.02.2013, 21:18:16 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> What are the rule IDs that identify spelling errors? I've seen
> ruleId="HUNSPELL_NO_SUGGEST_RULE". Anything else?
GERMAN_SPELLER_RULE
HUNSPELL_RULE
and
MORFOLOGIK_RULE__
for example:
MORFOLOGIK_RULE_CA_ES
MORFOLOGIK_RULE_IT_IT
Regards
Daniel
Am 06.02.2013 20:50, schrieb Daniel Naber:
> On 06.02.2013, 19:42:09 Stephan Hennig wrote:
>
>> Could you
>> please provide a way (a command-line option) so that LanguageTool writes
>> the list of misspelled words as one word per line?
>
> I think this can be parsed from the XML easily: take the
On 06.02.2013, 21:13:04 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Do you mean LanguageTool doesn't do 'true' spell-checking and only
> recognizes a small explicit subset of misspelled words? In the release
> notes I find this:
It uses proper spell checking, but it was added later so "unknown words" to
LT means:
Am 06.02.2013 20:31, schrieb Marcin Miłkowski:
> W dniu 2013-02-06 19:42, Stephan Hennig pisze:
>
>> 1. I noticed that LanguageTool provides an option -u to 'print a summary
>> of words from the input that LanguageTool doesn't know.' Great!
>> Unfortunately, the list format is rather non-standard.
On 06.02.2013, 19:42:09 Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Could you
> please provide a way (a command-line option) so that LanguageTool writes
> the list of misspelled words as one word per line?
I think this can be parsed from the XML easily: take the value of the
"context" attribute and then the substr
W dniu 2013-02-06 19:42, Stephan Hennig pisze:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the spelling package for LuaTeX,
> https://github.com/sh2d/spelling>, which can highlight spelling
> errors in LuaTeX's PDF output. The package writes a text file
> containing most of the text of the TeX document and re
30 matches
Mail list logo
